Statement on Lapu Lapu Day Festival Tragedy

The Asian Pacific American Medical Student Association (APAMSA) extends its deepest condolences to the Filipino Canadian community in the wake of the devastating tragedy at Vancouver’s Lapu Lapu Day festival. On April 26, 2025, a vehicle was driven into a crowd celebrating Filipino heritage, resulting in the loss of 11 lives and injuring over 20 individuals.

This senseless act has left an indelible mark on a community that was gathered together in joy and cultural pride. As future healthcare professionals committed to serving Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander communities, we stand in solidarity with those affected. We honor the resilience of the Filipino community and the dedication of the first responders and healthcare workers who provided immediate care and continue to support the victims and their families.

APAMSA reaffirms its commitment to fostering safe and inclusive environments for all communities. We pledge to advocate for mental health awareness, community support systems, and preventive measures to ensure such tragedies do not recur (Resolution 30.001). In this time of mourning, we offer our support and stand united with the Filipino Canadian community.

For more information on how to help, please look to Filipino BC (@filipino_bc) and at the official City of Vancouver website for more updates and ways to support the community in the future.

If you or someone you know needs support, please reach out:

988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline: Call or text 988 (24/7, nationwide)

Asian Mental Health Collective – Resource Directory: asianmhc.org/resources 

Crisis Text Line: Text HELLO to 741741

For questions about this statement, please reach out to the National President, James Chua at president@apamsa.org, the Southeast Asian Director, Fern Vichaikul at sadirector@apamsa.org, or the Rapid Response Director, Brian Leung at rapidresponse@apamsa.org



Personal Statement and ERAS Workshop

In this episode, Dr. Grace Kajita, Dr. Indu Partha, and Dr. Sreekala Raghavan share their expertise on crafting a compelling personal statement and navigating the ERAS application process. They discuss key strategies for standing out in a competitive residency cycle, common mistakes to avoid, and what program directors are really looking for. Tune in to hear their practical tips, real-world insights, and thoughtful advice on helping your story shine – whether you’re applying yourself or mentoring the next generation of physicians.

Listen here:

Youtube

Spotify

Apple Podcasts

This episode was produced by Annie Nguyen and Ashley Tam, hosted by Tanvi Chitre and Mason Zhu, and graphic by Callista Wu and Claire Sun.

Time Stamps: 

0:00 Introduction to White Coats & Rice: An APAMSA Podcast 

1:16 Introduction to Drs. Grace Kajita, Indu Partha, and Sreekala Raghavan

3:15 Mastering Letters of Recommendation with Dr. Indu Partha

10:50 Telling Your Story Through ERAS Experiences with Dr. Sreekala Raghavan

23:26 Crafting a Personal Statement with Dr. Kajita

30:46 How Should I Approach the “Hometown” Section?

33:09 How to Use Program and Geographic Signalling

35:53 Virtual Open House Etiquette and Post-Event Follow-up

39:58 Potential Red Flags in Applications

44:18 Letters of Recommendation – What to Consider and How Many to Get

48:54 How to Find Virtual Open Houses for Internal Medicine Residency Programs

51:04 Should I Mention Subspecialty Interests in My Personal Statement? 

54:33 Event Outro

55:14 Closing

 

Full Transcript 

0:00 Introduction to White Coats & Rice: An APAMSA Podcast 

Annie: Welcome everyone to the 10th episode of the Asian Pacific American Medical Student Association Podcast. From roundtable discussions of current health topics, to recaps of our panels with distinguished leaders in the healthcare field, to even meeting current student leaders within the organization – this is White Coats and Rice. My name is Annie Nguyen, a postbac at Stanford University, and a member of the Leadership Committee here at APAMSA. I’ll be your host for today! 

In this special workshop episode, we’re joined by three incredible physicians—Dr. Grace Kajita, Dr. Indu Partha, and Dr. Sreekala Raghavan—to dive deep into the art and strategy behind crafting a standout personal statement and mastering the ERAS application.

Whether you’re prepping for residency applications yourself, or mentoring students who are, this episode is packed with invaluable advice, real-world insights, and actionable tips to help your story shine. From dos and don’ts to what program directors are really looking for, our panel covers it all with warmth, honesty, and unmatched expertise.

Today’s episode was moderated by Tanvi Chitre, a medical student at the California Health Sciences University and Mason Zhu, a medical student at the Georgetown University School of Medicine. Both are members of the 2024 Leadership Committee. 

 

1:16 Introduction to Drs. Grace Kajita, Indu Partha, and Sreekala Raghavan

Tanvi: Welcome to our Personal Statement workshop. We’re so glad to have you here. And, um, we’re really glad to have our three amazing speakers who will be answering all your questions and sharing all their knowledge about the residency process. And this workshop is brought to you by the National APAMSA Leadership Committee. So hope you enjoy! So our three speakers are Dr. Grace Kajita, Dr. Skreekala Raghavan, and Dr. Indu Partha. And they’ll be talking about different aspects of the residency application and also doing a Q&A with everyone at the end. Doctor Raghavan, if you wanted to introduce yourself. 

Dr. Raghavan: Yeah. Thanks so much. Um. I’m Skreekala Raghavan, I am an associate program director for internal medicine residency at Mount Sinai Morningside in West, which is in New York. I’m excited to be here and joining you guys today. 

Tanvi: Thank you for having– for coming. And Dr. Partha.

Dr. Partha: Hi, everybody. I’m Indu Partha. I am also an associate program director for our internal medicine residency program here in Tucson at the University of Arizona College of Medicine. I’m super excited to be here, and I’m thankful to the organizers for putting on this event. 

Tanvi: Great. We’re so glad to have you. And finally, Dr. Kajita. 

Dr. Kajita: Sorry I had a little trouble unmuting there. Hi, everyone. It’s nice to meet you all. I’m Grace Kajita. I am the program director for the internal medicine residency program at Montefiore Medical Center, specifically the Wakefield Track. And for those of you who don’t know where we are, we are actually in the Bronx, New York. Thanks so much. 

Tanvi: Perfect. Thank you all. So this, um, is the little snapshot of what we’ll talk about in this presentation. We’ll cover letter of recommendations, experiences, and the personal statement. And then lastly is the Q&A. 

 

3:15 Mastering Letters of Recommendation with Dr. Indu Partha

Tanvi: So we’ll start off with Dr. Partha for the letters and rec. 

Dr. Partha: All right. Thank you so much Tanvi and Mason and Reanna for the invitation. And I’m super excited to talk to you guys about letters of recommendation, I think. Um, a couple of things I’d like to go over is when to ask for these recommendations. Um, who to ask for the recommendations and what to ask them, um, to actually do for you. So I think one of the hardest things for any student is just the anxiety that is related to asking somebody for a letter of recommendation, and I wish there was a way I could tell you that, you know, this is an easy thing. I think depending on different people’s personalities, um, and their interactions with their faculty and attendings, um, it can be easier for some, harder for others. But I want to reassure all of you guys that from a faculty standpoint, we all recognize when it is, um, time for applications to be turned in, we understand and know that our students are going to need letters of recommendation, um, from us. I think those of us in internal medicine especially, is one of the core clerkships are quite, um, used to having students approach us. So I don’t think you need to worry that this is a shocker to an attending that you’re going to be asking, and so at least feel a little bit reassured in that, you know, why is it important to ask the right people and make an effort to get a good letter of recommendation is, truthfully, you really want it to be a personal and non generic letter. Um, yes, letter writers are doing a lot of letter writing during application season. Um, but there are ways and I’ll go over some of those tips that I can offer you to help you create a more– personalized letter for yourself. Because in this day and age of AI, I think more and more letter writers are incorporating AI to help them write these letters. So what is it that we, as the folks asking for letters, can do to help improve our success? One of the biggest things, though, I would advise you all, is be mindful of who you’re asking for a letter. Um, make sure that this is someone who has seen you, you know, perform your best. You want to set yourself up for success, and it’s totally appropriate when you’re first meeting an attending on a on a clerkship that you know you need a letter from is just a straight up at the end of your first day to say, you know, “doctor so-and-so, I would really like to get a letter of recommendation from you at the end of this week because I’m applying for residency and XYZ– what would you recommend or what would you like to see for you to feel comfortable writing me a very strong letter of recommendation?” Um, and that’s going to be a clear ask. You kind of want to make it, um, apparent to your writer that you’re going to ask for a letter. You want them to know what you know. If you’re applying into internal medicine or surgery or what type of residency program you’re applying to. And once you take that next step and reach out with a letter in follow up. You can most certainly be a little prescriptive on what your hopes are of what they would like, what you would like them to focus on. For instance, you might have one attending who really saw you at your best in your interactions with patients, in your clinical care. You might have another attending who you’ve done research with, who can really speak to your scientific prowess, and another one, perhaps, who you did some type of procedural elective with, who can speak to your technical skills. So it’s perfectly okay and appropriate to ask each letter writer to focus on perhaps a different aspect of your skill set to highlight for your future programs to review. So, you know, you’ve settled with doctor So-and-so that they’re going to be willing to write you a letter, so when you write them a formal request via email, it’s helpful to be ready with all the information that they would need from you. And this is that kind of helpful information. You want to send your CV. You want to send a personal statement so they understand all that you have done already, what your personal statement and your ideology is. I know you guys will be getting some good tips here on what to include in that personal statement. Um, what I tell my students to include or residents when they’re applying for fellowship is, um, do you have evaluations that are from other rotations, from other classes that speak to how well you’ve done? All of that information can help show your letter writer what a well-rounded student you are. And I would include all of those. I would be very clear on what your deadline is. I would I need this letter to be submitted to ERAS by whatever my tip would be to put that deadline a week or so before your actual deadline, so you’re not scrambling towards the end. Um, perhaps ask them if it would be okay for you to send them periodic reminders. A lot of letter writers truly want to do right by their students, but just are so busy that they would actually appreciate getting some, um, reminders. And lastly, I would encourage you to provide some answers to some questions that I’ll review over to help you, um, personalize your letter. If I could get the next slide. I didn’t want to over text this, so I’m going to read these off, and you guys, if you feel like this could be of help and, you know, note them down. Um, I want to credit Dr. Kimberly Manning for, um, this idea. I’ve used it a lot for my letters that I’ve written, and it’s really helped me, uh, create some personalized letters. What I would do is when you write to your letter writers, you can tell them, you know, my mentor suggested I provide you some of these answers to help you in your letter writing to make it easier for you. Um, and the questions I have for my students answer is: “what are your strongest attributes and what are you most proud about yourself? Um, What have you done that could set you apart from other applicants? How would your peers or teammates describe you? What would you want to make sure the programs know about you and your candidacy? And then this is an optional one – what hardships, um, if you’re open to sharing, have you experienced that might cause you to be misunderstood? Again, totally optional and different students have different experiences. And lastly, three words you would like to see in your letter in support of your candidacy.” Um, if you provide answers to this and send it to different letter writers, just a reminder, please change your answers for each letter writer so they’re not all writing the same letter for you. But I have found utilizing my students answers to be very helpful for me personalizing their letters. Um, my last thing I would say is this isn’t the time to be humble. Utilize impactful words and language and be clear about what you’re proud of and what you have done. Um, this isn’t the time to, uh, sort of downplay your skill set, because this is your chance for your letter writers to advocate on your behalf. Thank you very much. 

Tanvi: Thank you so much, Doctor Partha, for all of that. 

 

10:50 Telling Your Story Through ERAS Experiences with Dr. Sreekala Raghavan

Tanvi: Next we have experiences from Doctor Raghavan. 

Dr. Raghavan: Thanks so much again. Thank you for having me here. This is you know, the section about experiences in ERAS has changed over the last number of years. And so I think the way that programs have been using this section has evolved over time. And so I anticipate a lot more questions will come up than just what I’ve answered here. But what I’m really going to talk about. Um, before the Q&A at the end is what should you really include in your experiences? What should you consider leaving out? Um, and in that ERAS section, what are the most meaningful experiences mean, and how do you select which ones they’re going to be? And then what– you know, what are really– what are what’s really being sought, uh, in that impactful experiences session, which is different than most meaningful. So, you know, you can probably guess that they’re looking for different experiences that you’ve had in, uh, in the ERAS- in this ERAS section, and that includes a bunch of pre-selected categories that you can select through, uh, the ERAS application itself. I’ve kind of highlighted some of them and combined some of them a little bit here, but a lot of them are the activities that you’ve taken on potentially as clubs or extracurriculars while you’ve been to medical school. Um, a lot of folks talk about the work that they’ve done. As it’s become increasingly popular to take time between medical school and residency, and some folks may have worked as a scribe or done their certification to be an EMT and worked as, uh, as an EMT, even customer service roles and and roles that are not directly related to medicine and the medical field are, you know, can highlight a lot of really amazing things about you, characteristics that you have or skills that you’ve built while doing that job. Um, and so these are kind of the, the larger areas that you want to talk about. Some particular things for– I’m not sure exactly sure who is in the audience– so just to point out, uh, for folks who either took a lot of time off between, um, college and med school or you’ve had a little bit of a, um, like you don’t have a standard 4 year timeline for medical school, you want to be sure to use your experiences to really build in the timeline. So this very often applies to folks who are going to medical school outside the US and uh, and coming to do residency in the US, where they may have graduated medical school some time ago also, and have some years, um, in between. So if they’ve done clinical experiences in the US as observerships or, um, any externships, hh, they should definitely list– you should definitely list all those experiences because as a, you know, on the program side, what I really want to know is what’s been happening during all of this time in between and what how are you learning and growing and changing and then kind of beyond that, um, what you’re really using this section to do is to highlight who you are. What are you passionate about? Um, you know why medicine, right? So you’re going to talk about why your particular field, why you went into medicine in general, um, in your personal statement. But this is where you kind of highlight all the activities that led up to that, the kind of evidence behind all the, uh, the larger statements that you make in your, in your personal statement. And when I’m reviewing experiences, I really want to know what you’re passionate about. So then, you know, you’ve done quite a lot of things, I’m sure, over, over the last number of years. So how do you decide which are the ones that you’re going to include? You can only include ten, and you can only mark three of those ten as your most meaningful experiences. So I would you know, when you’re really thinking about which those ten are, you want to highlight things that highlight that passion, right. And you want to choose things where you’ve really shown some sort of a commitment. You certainly want some if you have had leadership positions, for example, these folks, lovely folks who are running this workshop today as part of APAMSA leadership. So highlighting that, um, type of, uh, work that you’re doing through– or service that you’re doing rather– um, through your activities is really, uh, a way to, to separate yourself, right, to, to show how unique you are, uh, in your application. Hobbies? Also, I don’t have it as a separate section here, but hobbies do fall into this experiences section. Sometimes, uh, hobbies or work or significant activities, especially for medicine before your life in medicine, um, matter. So if you were, um, like a concert violinist for a bunch of years before you really got to this point, it highlights a lot about who you are– dedication, um, different skills that you build, um, potentially around problem solving, around dependability. Um, and so all of those characteristics that you want to show, if you want to show that those are the things that you’re strong in. And these activities can help you to highlight that. Um, this is not a CV. Uh, and so just to remember that, uh, you really want to pick these, these things that highlight exactly what– what helps you stand out from the, uh, larger pool of applicants. So then how do you move into selecting your most meaningful three? Answering those questions that, um, that I mentioned a little bit earlier, like: “Who are you? What are you most passionate about? And which were the activities that helped you grow the most?” That’s also really, um, impactful when I read it. Not impactful in the ‘Most Impactful’ on the experience that I’ll talk about a little bit later. But, um, when I’m reading an application and I see that, uh, somebody has a clear theme in the things that they’ve found to be meaningful, that they’ve really grown a lot, um, participating in particular activities. It helps me feel out whether this is somebody who’s going to thrive in my residency program environment or, um, not maybe enjoy taking care of the particular population that we take care of, um, or not, or want to focus on some of the additional opportunities that exist within my program. So I’m really looking, not just for somebody who qualifies kind of on paper as like a top student. I’m looking for somebody who really wants to train with me and wants to be in the environment that my residents are in. They’re going to have a great time and learn a ton of medicine and be great at the end of it. So those are, you know, the showing your growth through your meaningful experiences, I think is a really great way to highlight who you are and how you fit in your particular, um, learning environment. 

Dr. Raghavan: So what do you not want to include? Um, this is not a place to list and to have an exhaustive list of every single thing you’ve ever done. Um, some of the questions that often come up are, should I include things I’ve done in college? Yeah. I mean, if you did something for four years in college, you showed a real commitment to it. You had a leadership position in it, or you did something for a while between, um, between college and medical school. These are all things that you can include. So just the actual timing of it. Like the number of I mean, the year in which you started doing something is not or determines if it’s a really old activity. But if you volunteered for someone or something for three months in your freshman year of college, that does not go in your experiences section because it doesn’t really speak to who you are now as you apply for residency. Looking into like something that you participated in at one time, if that one thing was, you know, something that was really, really meaningful to you because it challenged you in a particular way and you grew, you could make a case for including something like that. But typically you want to– you want to show that you were really passionate about something and that it made an impact on you. This is not a place to list your abstracts and your manuscripts. There’s a separate research session for that, but that question does come up quite a lot when you list your research experiences, what you’re listing is what you learned through participating in research, not the abstract that came out of it, not the manuscript that came out of it, but what were you working on? What was your role? And so that was one of the other things not to include– if you really don’t remember what you did in a particular activity, it probably didn’t mean so much to you. So don’t put that down there. You will, you know, anything on your ERAS application is fair game in your interview. And so if you put down something that you’re not prepared to talk about, um, interviewers can be surprised and feel like, oh, even though you highlighted this was one of your 10 activities and you can’t really talk about it, they’ll question the veracity of the statement also. And so you don’t want to get caught out on that. And then again, not just that you don’t remember your role, but that you can’t describe the activity or the experience in detail because when questions about experiences come up, it’s often, you know, “what did you learn from that experience? How did you grow? What challenges did you face?” And you need to be able to describe all of those things to be able to to really show your passion and show how you stand above the crowd. And then finally, you don’t want to overlap everything with your personal statement or with the content that you go over, uh, typically with your student advisor that goes in your medical student performance evaluation or your MSPE. If they’re all exactly perfectly aligned, you just have a lot of repetition in your, uh, in your application. So you want to, you know, use this as an opportunity, this section as an opportunity to highlight other things about your commitments. 

Dr. Raghavan: And so then the final question that really comes up about, um, about this section is that there is a separate question about impactful experiences. So meaningful is the meaningful experiences that you highlight, which are three of your ten experiences are the things that you know you really want to show that you are passionate about. Impactful experiences, not everybody will necessarily have to answer to know, what the question is really asking is whether you had any real obstacles during, you know, during medical school or potentially at a time before medical school kind of leading into your career as you start. Um, and so if there was something that really impacted your journey and maybe made, uh, made that distance traveled greater if there. You know, very commonly we see, uh, personal illness stories in this, uh, in this section, you may see, um, other kind of, uh, socioeconomic difficulties of getting into, um, a particular track or into medicine, um, listed in, uh, in the Impactful experiences section. But, uh, by and large, most students are not actually filling out this, um, this section because you don’t– this is not a standard section that we expect to see something in. This is a way to explain something that may have affected your– your path as you were on, you know, on your way to where we meet you, um, and that you had to overcome. And so it helps, uh, it helps us to see who you are a little bit differently, and how you arrived at the place that you are at and understand, you know, what hardships you really had to, had to kind of go through. Um, and then just to remember that you don’t have to explicitly state that your impactful experience, uh, had, you know, had something to do with your meaningful experiences. But if you overcame a particular challenge and then you volunteered for a foundation that helps folks, um, overcome such a challenge, or you have a leadership position and something like that, it’s clear to kind of see that, um, as a full circle without having to necessarily, uh, list it out in your application. 

Tanvi: Thank you so much for that comprehensive look on how to figure out what, um, experiences to include. 

 

23:26 Crafting a Personal Statement with Dr. Kajita

Tanvi: Um, finally, we have Doctor Kajita with the personal statement. 

Dr. Kajita: So I am super lucky because I’m following two really excellent speakers who really have said so much about what makes the foundation of a personal state. And you’re going to see a lot of themes repeated in what I’m about to say. The personal statement for some reason has, at least in my experience, turned into this somewhat painful exercise that everyone leaves until the very end just before they submit their application. Because it feels big. And I want to let you know that you don’t need to do that. You can start it right away. You can work on it in bits. It doesn’t have to be painful, you just want to get started. The second thing I want to say about it, that I’ve learned in my experience, from talking to people who are applying largely for fellowship, that I think people feel that there’s some sort of way that you can read the mind of the person who’s going to be reading your personal statement and sort of craft something for that person. Note that this is a personal statement. This is about you. And honestly, all of us who are reading a personal statement really just want to know about you and know about what you care about and know why you’re here. So don’t feel that there is an absolute formula or that you’re trying to quote “game the system”. Write your personal statement about yourself using many of the tips that have already been discussed. And so when I say make it personal, do all the things that Dr. Raghavan just said about what you want to include and keep it simple. You really don’t need to include everything about your life, as long as it’s all really about you and in your voice. One of the things that we tend to do is we tend to be a little bit modest. Please give yourself credit for what you’ve done. You’ve made it this far. You are all really impressive people. Be proud of that. Share that. We want to, we want to know about that. And when giving yourself credit. This is not about itemizing all of your accomplishments. This is about really saying something about yourself, particularly maybe what you’ve been proud of, what has brought you to medicine. Don’t repeat your your CV. And because you want this to be in your own voice, do not. Please do not use ChatGPT or AI. This is a whole new frontier. They’re probably going to be better rules about how to use it in the future. It’s okay if it doesn’t sound like classic literature. This is you again. Be honest and don’t stretch things to make it sound more impressive, because that’s how– so the Olympics are on. You can say, I played soccer in college, but you don’t have to turn it into. I was on the Olympic stage, right, because someone’s going to ask you about it, right? Only include stuff that you can really talk about. It’s okay. On the same note, to not have too much stuff in there. This is about quality stuff. Okay. It doesn’t have to be two pages. In fact, you want to keep it one page. You want to keep it tight. You want someone to read it. For typos and proofreading and for how it’s phrased right? If your reader is a friend, maybe it can be honest with you and faculty and say, this is kind of boring, you’re kind of trying too hard. That’s okay. That’s why you’re going to give yourself time at the beginning, because it’s like crafting any good, any good essay. It’s going to take multiple rewrites, but don’t be intimidated by it. You can all do it. You all done statements like this before. 

Dr. Kajita: Now some people have some questions about how to format your personal statement. What do I start with? Is there any one way to do it? There really isn’t. I usually tell people. Um, you can start with an anecdote if you like, but we are always– thank you for your advancing the slide. Um, and that’s often what people do, and to a point where it’s almost become a formula, but it can be a positive. It’s a good way to start. Maybe that’s not where you end up, but the classic to the point that as readers, we sometimes kind of all, um, laugh or in a kind way, mind you? Oh, this is familiar. We know where this is going. Phil and the family member had a heart attack. Ended up in the emergency room. You did CPR on the field? They- they survived. And this is why you want to become a doctor? Okay, that’s great, but it’s not necessary. Some of you have never had this kind of crisis. You may have other reasons. Do you not feel that you have to fit things into a formula. Similarly, I get asked this a lot and I see it done well sometimes and not so well. Think about whether or not you want to start your essay with a quote from Doctor William Osler, because it’s a medical quote– don’t do it to impress us. Do your quote if it’s something that really means a lot to you, okay. And the quote doesn’t have to be a famous person, but we’re also used to seeing the quote that my grandfather said, fill in the blank. That you should become a doctor. Okay. You don’t need to do that either. Okay. It means a lot to you, and you can tell a story. Which includes things about why you are the right person for this particular residency. Go ahead. Okay. The reason why I say maybe or maybe not on this slide is because I put it out there and then have someone look at it and see if it seems genuine. Okay? Because this again, it’s about you. Please do not recycle your med school applications. Okay? I see people do this, and you’re already so much more impressive by the fact that you’ve gotten into med school and you’ve done all of these things. You’re not the same person. Not just in accomplishments, but in your insights and your personality. You’ve grown. Please don’t recycle the old application. Finally, some people have asked, well, I really want to stand out. I want to do something different. People try to do things like write essays in iambic pentameter. One wrote an essay about, um, going to Shake Shack. Okay, this is a real essay. Okay. It was a remarkably successful essay, but that doesn’t mean that it’s the best essay for you. It might be entertaining, but it might not be what the program director is looking for you. Remember, this is a representation of you, and we’re not looking for fireworks– were looking for you. So please, if you are an amazing writer, you have a talent for it, go ahead. You know, this is one of those things that you want to include in your experiences or really makes you stand out. Be my guest. But it’s not necessary. Use good judgment about these things. And always, always. A lot of people want to help you succeed, and we are a friendly audience, so please, please don’t be afraid to share your work before you submit it. And that’s all I have to say. 

Tanvi: Thank you so much. Um, the personal statement is always a huge obstacle to overcome in these applications, so your advice is very helpful. 

 

30:46 How Should I Approach the “Hometown” Section?

Tanvi: Um, next we have some FAQs. Um, first, what to write for hometown. Um, if anyone wants to address that. 

Dr. Partha: I might just speak up only because, um, I think between me, Doctor Kajita and Doctor Raghavan, I am from a program in a relatively smaller town and a less populous state. So the only advice here I would have is, you know, we don’t need ten different hometowns of every place you have ever lived. However, where this can be somewhat useful for programs like mine and Tucson where yes, we do kind of look through and see what an Arizona connection might be because, you know, we want applicants who are really serious about coming here is if you did not go to undergrad or medical school in a particular state or location, that’s a bit smaller, but you do have some connection, like maybe you did live here, you know, between birth and sixth grade, I, I think that can be helpful to signal to a program in a smaller location that, hey, I actually do have some connection to Arizona. So me living in Iowa right now, applying to Tucson isn’t as crazy as it might look. Even though I went to undergrad in Michigan and medical school in Chicago, and I grew up in Iowa, that’s where my permanent address is. So sometimes the hometown, if it’s a legitimate connection to a place, might be a great way to sort of slide in a little bit of an indication to a program in a less popular location or city or state that you do, in fact, have a, uh, a connection, a personal connection to that place. 

Dr. Kajita: So if I could add a comment to that. People have lots of options. You can fill in more than one hometown. But going back to the whole issue of is it meaningful? Remember, if someone’s going to ask you about your hometown potentially. So make sure it really is a substantial connection to that town, and not just the two months you spent there on vacation with your family because you want to impress someone. 

 

33:09 How to Use Program and Geographic Signalling

Tanvi: Um, next, is it useful to apply to many more programs than number of signals you have as an applicant? Um, and geographic versus program signaling. Thoughts? 

Dr. Raghavan: I think this. Um, so all three of us happen to be from internal medicine. Um, and so the I think the answer to this question really varies based on the specialty that you’re applying into, um, in internal medicine, it’s typical to apply to many more programs than the number of signals that you have. Um, most folks are applying pretty broadly, you know, whether that’s in a particular geographic region or not, or if they’re just applying widely around the country. That’s um, that’s very normal in internal medicine, in other, um, in some really competitive fields. Uh, a lot of programs actually, uh, do look really mainly at the folks who have signaled them. So I know in dermatology this is a significant, um, way that folks try to limit the number of applications that they’re reviewing. Um, and so a lot of dermatology programs, especially in very populous cities, um, do use the signals as a way to essentially say, these are the folks that I’m going to really review first. Um, they may continue to review after, um, but if they fill their number of interview slots with folks that have signaled them, those are going to be folks that are really getting that preference in a, in a very competitive field. Um, and then geographic versus program signaling again in very, very competitive, uh, fields. I think program signaling really carries the strength over geographic signaling. Whereas, um, in fields like pediatrics, family medicine, internal medicine, um, there are or kind of larger number of programs, um, geographic signaling carries a significant amount of weight, because if there are a large number of programs in a particular field, in a particular, uh, area, you may not be able to signal all of the programs in that area, even if you’re very interested in living in that particular area. And so programs that have, uh, or specialties that have a lot of programs in a particular, um, area may use geographic signaling even maybe preferentially over program signaling. Um, and then finally, the competitiveness, I guess, of the actual program itself also determines, to some degree, the answers.

 

35:53 Virtual Open House Etiquette and Post-Event Follow-up

Tanvi: Okay. Thank you for that. And finally, um, what is good etiquette for attending virtual open houses? Maybe doctor Kajita, if you wanted to take that one. 

Dr. Kajita: Sure. And I’m sure the people will have some opinions on this. I think the main thing is that you are present, that you are courteous to not just the faculty, but your colleagues. I found that at some open houses, it it turns into a little bit of a competition to impress. Just if you have a question, ask. And certainly, um, collaborate with the– your co-participants because you’re going to be seeing a lot of each other on the interview trail. It’s important that you can start some of these relationships now. Um, do all of the appropriate things that you do on a zoom call and all of those things in terms of muting and not muting, not having a lot of noise in the background, those kinds of things that you would do in any type of meeting. I’m not sure what specifically this question was addressing Reanna. I think you were the one who brought it up. Is there anything in particular that we can answer for you? 

Reanna: I was curious more along the lines of like, reaching out to programs after you attended an open house, or what’s the etiquette there? Because I know contacting programs, you don’t want to contact them too much, but if something’s meaningful. Like how do you approach that?

Dr. Kajita: Okay, that’s a great question. Um, my answer to that is I, I don’t mind at all, and I appreciate a short thank you. Um, however, I would prefer that once you thank me. Thank you, thank you. That, you know, you don’t need to continually send more thank yous. I’m interested in this. I like this so much about your program. A simple thank you is more than enough for me. And I’m curious as to what the other faculty think. 

Dr. Partha: Yeah, I would agree. And I would say, etiquette wise. Um, the thing to remember is, granted, there might be a lot of people on line, but, um. You can be remembered both for being positive and for being negative. You know, some of the residents who are online definitely give feedback. Oh, this one student was really, you know, whatever XYZ either positive or negative. So if you’re really serious about a program and are showing up to the open house, I would say bring your A game, know about the program, be a little bit ready with some really good specific questions to indicate, hey, I’ve really looked at your website and know about your program. Um, and those are ways to kind of set yourself up a little bit so that, um, if like a chief resident is online, there’s no faculty, that chief might say, oh, there was, you know, a student named Reanna. She really seemed very interested and super excited and polite and, um, you know, we’d love to have her versus, oh, gosh, there was this one student who all they were concerned about is how many vacation days they’re going to get. And what’s the days off? Um, and so just realizing that what you’re saying can often really help or sometimes, unfortunately, um, be negative for you. 

Dr. Raghavan: I also want to highlight that it’s a little bit of a first-date situation and you are also assessing the program. Right? This is usually your slightly more extended way to hang out with some of the house staff or people currently in the program and get a sense of if these are people you want to spend a lot of hours in somewhat stressful situations with. And you want to– certainly you don’t want your questions to focus on the schedule and vacations, that’s usually included on the website or materials on your recruitment day, but really get to know what connects people in the program and showing that level of interest, so showing that you know a lot about the program for sure but showing a level of extra interest of what would it really be like to be in this program also can get noticed as a passion for that program.

 

39:58 Potential Red Flags in Applications

Tanvi: Okay, perfect, so last we have about 15 minutes left and we will do the Q&A session now. I think Mason and Reanna have been combining all the questions together so if you want to tell us the first couple questions.

Mason: Sure, I will bring those questions up. Thank you all of submitting your questions, we may not get to all of them but we will try to prioritize the ones that apply to most of the people. We got a question, I think it goes along the lines of what not to do that Dr. Raghavan mentioned about some of the open house etiquette, but for application reviewers, what are some of the common red flags that you will see on someone’s personal statement or their ERAS application overall?

Dr. Raghavan: I’m just going to say that if there is something that makes you stand out in a particular way, like you had to repeat something or you know there’s going to be a statement about something that is not the most positive in your MSPE which typically, medical schools now allow you to see even if you can’t edit– that should be explained somewhere. A red flag for me is not that actual thing, the repetition of a clerkship or something like that, the red flag is not knowing what happened and potentially– as a reviewer, I think, maybe the student didn’t realize this was significant and didn’t use it as a learning opportunity. But I want to see that there was reflection about it, that particular experience. 

Mason: All right. Thank you. Dr. Kajita or Doctor Partha, anything to add? 

Dr. Partha: I would definitely, um, emphasize what Dr. Raghavan mentioned. Yeah, you definitely want to see an explanation. And I don’t know that this would be a red flag, but perhaps something. Um, I think both to what? Uh, Dr. Raghavan and Kajita reviewed over what is meaningful experiences. If you know, someone just has a list of volunteer activities and they’re each just one day for two hours, and that’s what fills their application. Um, again, like I said, not a red flag, but perhaps, you know, this person might be stretching for experiences and working on quantity over quality, so it might just dilute the competitiveness of an application.

Dr. Kajita: I would agree with both those. And the only other thing which isn’t obvious is having a lot of mistakes right? On your– on your application. If you, you know, it’s a it’s an important thing to you. And if it feels like maybe you’re not paying attention or you’re not as careful as we would hope you would be if there were a lot of typos, grammatical errors, spelling errors. You spelled your own name incorrectly. I’ve seen that before. I would worry a little bit about that. So just. That’s an easy one. Just be careful. 

Dr. Raghavan: The one random thing and I feel kind of silly saying this, but, um, see what your picture is saying about you? Like, is it a just a nice– nobody is looking for an expensive fancy picture, but, you know, do you have a nice expression on your face? Is your hair combed and are you looking put together? Um, for the most part we see great pictures. But every so often we do see pictures that kind of grab our attention. And that might not be really the way you want to grab a reviewer’s attention is by a picture that’s kind of, um, standing out for being a little too dramatic, or somebody just threw something on and and took a picture. 

Mason: Great, great. Thank you. It sounds like, you know, be forthcoming, be honest with your application. And also double, triple check your your work. 

 

44:18 Letters of Recommendation – What to Consider and How Many to Get

Mason: And we received another question, a couple questions regarding the letters of recommendation. Uh, one of the questions was just asking, what type of letter writer– what type of letter writers are recommended? Uh, if you have a research mentor versus clinical versus your clerkship director, and kind of what’s the recommended number of letters to get. 

Dr. Partha: I mean, most oftentimes you’ll need three letters of recommendation. One of them might be your, you know, chair letter from your department, different schools. What have different people? Um, writing that letter in our, um, institution, it’s our IM clerkship director, and it’s co-signed by the the chair. Um, I would say most certainly you want somebody who’s going to be in, in your field that you are applying to. So if you are applying to surgery, you need a surgeon. If you’re applying to medicine, you need someone in medicine. Um, you definitely want to look for people who are going to be able to write a good quality letter, not someone that was, oh, they’re super well known in their field, but I worked with them for two days. Um, so for the sake of that, you don’t want somebody to give you, like, a one paragraph meaningless letter just because they’re a star in the field. So you really want to look for, um, quality letters and then from the specialty that you are applying to. And if you don’t have all the letters from that specialty, usually it’s going to be helpful to have, you know, folks who’ve had more of your core clerkship experiences who have spent a little bit more time with you. Um, but if you’re really passionate about research and that’s what your career is, um, going ahead towards, obviously I would definitely have your research mentor letter speaking to your skill set there. 

 

46:13 Letters of Recommendation for Sub-I Rotations and Visiting Students

Mason: Great. Thanks. And, you know, just to piggyback off that question, someone else asked. Kind of relating to quality of letters for fourth year med students who are doing sub-Is and they’re rotating at your institution. If they don’t feel like they’re getting a lot of time with the PDs. Um, should they still try to ask the PD, or should they try to focus their attention and ask the attending that they spent more time with? 

Dr. Kajita: I tend to be a fan of the person who knows you better. I mean, a PD letter– PD is also just so you know, they’re cautious, right? Because you know, they know sometimes that their letters carry some weight. And so unfortunately sometimes those letters hopefully the PD would be frank about saying that, you know, I think someone else might write you a better letter, but the person who knows you and has seen what you can do in your sub-I in an actual clinical setting, that’s great. I think for myself, if it’s a strong, um, faculty letter from your sub-internship.

Dr. Raghavan: I think that’s great. I would say the other part of that, and I agree with Dr. Kajita completely, is that in certain specialties that are smaller, a lot of folks will really a lot of the faculty will know each other from around the country because they network at conferences. And, you know, they’ve spent a bunch of time in that area of expertise. And so if they see a letter from someone that they know, even peripherally, they may reach out to that person and, and ask like, oh, what was it really like to work with this, this candidate that I’m really interested in? Um, and if the response is like, well, I got asked for this letter, I didn’t really know the person that well, um, that’s not so great. And it’s much better to have a letter from somebody who’s going to really, you know, stand in your corner and talk about why you’re the right candidate. 

Dr. Partha: I might just add two for the student to double check what the culture is in that program. Because I know for us, like our PD does not write letters for visiting sub I’s. I mean, she will write them if she’s there attending, but if they’re rotating, you know, with me she’s not going to write a letter. So, um, versus students thinking that’s the culture and what they need to do, they should kind of check ahead of time what’s traditionally done or expected, but completely agree with Dr. Kajita and Dr. Raghavan, to ask the person you’ve worked with, not the person who has the higher job title. 

 

48:54 How to Find Virtual Open Houses for Internal Medicine Residency Programs

Mason: Great. Thank you. Um, you know, we have three of you amazing PDS and APDs and, um, you’re all in the internal medicine, uh, area. So we have a couple questions that are a little more tailored to the IM residency. Uh, we had a question asking what the best way to find the virtual open houses for IM programs. 

Dr. Raghavan: So there might be kind of different definitions of this, because there are the kind of meet and greets when you’ve applied for a program. So that’s going to come directly from the program and be highlighted to you. Um, otherwise, you know, different programs that have virtual open houses for larger groups of folks in a particular area from a particular background or, um, particular set of interests. Um, those will usually come out through interest groups, advertising to interest groups, or advertising to student advisors, or sort of through your medical school. Um, I know at Mount Sinai where I am, the way that, um, the programs really have a kind of pre, uh, before we’re– we’re able to see, um, IRAs before you guys finish, uh, submitting all your ERAS applications our virtual open houses are advertised to medical schools around the country to their to advertise to their students, um, so that they can join and see what our programs are all about. And we usually do kind of a combined, uh, virtual open house across specialties. And then we break out into breakout groups so that folks can meet those in their specialty. 

Mason: I just did a quick search on Google and it seems like, you know, for internal medicine programs, they might be specific to the school. So, um, you might, you know, uh, you know, might have some luck finding the specific programs you’re interested in and then seeing if they have an open house. Um, I know some specialties, like anesthesiology they have and like a central hub that lists all the open houses. So I would think that might also be helpful as well. 

 

51:04 Should I Mention Subspecialty Interests in My Personal Statement? 

Mason: Um, another question for kind of internal medicine, but also subspecialty related in your ERAS or personal statement, should you include your interest about these subspecialties? For example, if you have a passion in, uh, cardiology or any of the other subspecialties. 

Dr. Kajita: I’ll take the first crack at this one. Um, I think that that there are there are a group of people who know from day one what they want to be, and that’s great. And there are people who don’t know or think they know and change their minds. So when I read a personal– certain personal statements for residency and they come in wanting to do cardiology and then they change their mind, that’s okay. I think the more important thing is, is it a coherent personal statement that talks about them and why they want to do cardiology particularly? Right. 50% of them who come to me change their minds, but I don’t– the personal statement was still great. So, um, I think that some people worry that they will be pegged in a way that, oh, we don’t have those kinds of we can’t support that particular interest, or we have too many people who want to become this particular thing. So, uh, but you don’t know if this is a program you’re interested in, think about that as well. What is this program like? You also want to think about when you write your personal statement. In some ways, that may also help you think about which programs you’re most interested in and how you rank them, because sometimes that also helps to define what your future career goals are. So I would say there’s no sorry, I’m so ambivalent about everything, but there’s no hard and fast rule about that as long as it’s honest and it’s you. 

Dr. Raghavan: I will note that sometimes programs use, um, specialty interest information to, um, like, if they have resident buddies that they pair you up with after the match. So when those kinds of shared interests to say, hey, you know, I’ve got a second year who’s also interested in cardiology, I’ll help you out. And so if you’re really, you know, very interested in that sort of match up, um, and it makes a difference to you and how you transition into residency, it could be helpful. But then there are definitely programs, probably not the majority of PDS that I know. Certainly when I was doing my own recruitment as a PD I didn’t use specialties to say like, I’m not going to, you know, rank this many people who want to go into cardiology or GI or something. Um, but there are definitely programs that do use that, um, that type of criteria where they want to have a mix of folks in their class. Somebody wants to go to pulmonology and someone going to allergy and not a class that’s like split into GI, cards, and heme onc. 

Dr. Partha: Let’s keep in mind that when you interview on that personal statement, your program does not want to hear all about you being a future cardiologist. But first, why you’re going to be an amazing internal medicine resident for them. So just watch how you sell yourself, because that could be off-putting. If your whole interview is about your passion for cardiology when you’re not applying for a fellowship at that moment. 

 

54:33 Event Outro

Mason: All right. Thank you very much. Um, it looks like we’re about to approach the 9:00 mark eastern time. Um, so that’ll be our last question. But, um, you know, first of all, we want to thank Dr. Kajita, Dr. Raghavan and Dr. Partha for coming and speaking about the IRAs and personal statement and really helping us neurotic third and fourth year med students and aspiring physicians kind of, um, get their bearings. Um, I believe, uh, our panelists have also agreed to share their emails or contact information. So, you know, if you have any lingering questions or interests, you can feel free to reach out to them as well. 

 

55:14 Closing

Annie: And that’s our latest installment from the Leadership Committee. If you have a specific topic or specialty you’d love to hear more about, please let us know. You can reach us at professionaldev@apamsa.org. We hope you enjoyed today’s episode as much as we did, and don’t forget to tune in next time! Thanks everyone! 


2025 National Conference Posters

Congratulations to all of our 2025 APAMSA Research Award winners!

Be sure to stay tuned for more opportunities to feature your research at upcoming regional and national conferences.

Interested in featuring your research with APAMSA? Email research@apamsa.org for more information!

Research Award Winners

Anne Chen – Impact of a Community Stroke Education Initiative for the Nashville Asian American and Pacific Islander Population

Background: Prior studies demonstrate an increased prevalence of primary intracranial hemorrhage with lengthened hospital stays within the Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) population. AAPI patients who experience acute ischemic strokes may be less likely to receive intravenous thrombolytic therapy despite presenting with strokes of greater severity.[1] Yet, minimal research has been conducted to explore why these disparities exist. This project was conducted to assess for gaps within stroke education (symptom identification, risk factors, and primary prevention measures) and evaluate the utility of a stroke outreach initiative in the Nashville AAPI community.

Methods: A stroke outreach initiative was designed and administered to provide education on stroke symptoms using the FAST acronym, risk factors, and the importance of regular follow-up with primary care. Participants also received stroke educational materials in English, Simplified Chinese, Japanese, Korean, or Vietnamese from reliable sources (e.g., the American Heart Association, MedlinePlus). Pre- and post-education surveys assessed knowledge of stroke symptoms and primary stroke prevention. Proportional analysis and non-parametric analysis of paired comparisons (McNemar test) are reported.

Results: Twenty-two API community members at an AAPI festival in Nashville, TN participated in the initiative. Pre-initiative surveys revealed 8/22 (36%) participants were unable to identify stroke symptoms, 9/22 (40%) participants did not know what actions to take if someone is experiencing a stroke, and 10/22 (45%) participants did not follow up with primary care at least yearly (Figure 1). Post-initiative surveys showed a statistically significant improvement (p<0.05) where 21/22 (95%) participants correctly reported two of the FAST symptoms (Figure 2). 8/8 (100%) participants who previously were unable to identify stroke symptoms identified at least two symptoms post-initiative. All participants found this initiative beneficial.

Conclusion: An education initiative reviewing FAST symptoms, stroke risk factors, and primary stroke prevention through regular follow-up with primary care can improve the quality of stroke education in the Nashville AAPI population. Additional instruction and increased frequency of the initiative may improve retention of knowledge and further encourage stroke awareness and primary stroke prevention to a wider AAPI audience.

Alice Liu – Achieving Health Equity: Recognizing the Health Profiles of Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) Communities in the Greater Cleveland Area and Closing the Gap in Clinical Trials

Background: Despite clinical trials playing a crucial role in treatment development, there is significant misalignment of minority race distribution between general population and clinical trial participants in the United States. Asian Americans are one of the most underrepresented minority groups-despite being the fastest-growing population in America-constituting less than 2% of clinical trial participants. This disparity affects the generalizability of clinical trial results and equitable healthcare delivery. The aim of this study is to identify barriers to clinical trial participation specific to AAPI communities in Greater Cleveland.

Methods: This research employs a mixed-methods approach to investigate cultural and socioeconomic barriers within AAPI communities. A survey encompassing cultural and socioeconomic barriers identified in previous literature were distributed to 50 participants in each of the following communities: Chinese (Cleveland Asiatown), Chinese (Greater Cleveland Area), Filipino, Pakistani and Afghan. Qualitative data was collected through focus groups, each comprising five community members from the groups mentioned above, to facilitate comprehensive exploration of distinct obstacles experienced by each community.

Results: We collected 196 surveys, with ages of participants ranging from 19 to 89 years old. 58% of participants have heard of clinical trials, but the vast majority (92%) knew nothing or little about them. 15% have participated or knew someone who participated in a clinical trial, though 48% said they are somewhat or very likely to participate if asked. The importance of incentives such as monetary compensation, transportation, and encouragement from trusted individuals varied widely between the communities. In the focus groups, specific groups noted unique challenges stemming from cultural and religious attitudes. Key takeaways included the importance of culturally competent outreach, transparent risk disclosure and education on the benefits of clinical trials to individuals and society, and community-centered approaches to recruitment.

Conclusions: While our findings mostly align with existing literature on the common barriers to clinical trial participation for minority populations, we highlight distinct barriers and motivators within various AAPI subgroups. Further meta-analysis of demographics data and health attitudes can be used to target and address AAPI clinical trial recruitment in the Greater Cleveland area.

Sunshine Liu – Understanding Diabetes: A Comparative Analysis of Diabetes Literacy and Confidence in South Asian and White Populations in Michigan

Background: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) prevention and management remains a challenge in Michigan. As of 2023, nearly half of the state’s population is affected with DM or pre-diabetes, with higher morbidity among minority groups. To address these disparities, osteopathic medical students at Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine (MSUCOM), under faculty mentorship, created Understanding Diabetes, an educational project emphasizing biomedical understanding of DM and tailored management strategies. Initially piloted in the South Asian (SA) community in Oakland County MI, it expanded to Berrien County MI, an area with higher poverty and lower educational attainment. This enabled comparisons of objective understanding and subjective confidence in managing DM between White populations of lower socioeconomic status (SES) and SA populations of higher SES.

Methods: Understanding Diabetes used an observational descriptive study design (IRB STUDY00010026), in SA (N=18) and White (N=17) populations in selected geographic areas in Michigan. Data were collected to assess the baseline objective understanding of DM across several categories as well as participant-reported confidence in managing DM. Results were analyzed by comparing populations’ proportion of correct and affirmative responses using chi-squared proportion tests (CI95).

Results: SA participants reported significantly higher confidence overall in managing DM than White participants (74% vs 51%, p<0.05). This was also seen in categories of general knowledge (86% vs 56%, p<0.05), lifestyle management (81% vs 60%, p<0.05), and complications and emergency management (68% vs 47%, p<0.05). However, regarding objective understanding, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two populations (56% vs 58%).

Conclusion: SA participants exhibited similar levels of objective understanding of DM compared to White participants despite higher SES and greater educational attainment. These findings suggest that racial factors, such as language barriers and discrimination, may influence health literacy, potentially overriding SES and education. Additionally, the higher confidence reported by SA participants may reflect underlying cultural attitudes towards DM, including stigma and tendency to act on social desirability bias. As Michigan’s SA population grows, culturally sensitive educational interventions are critical to addressing disparities and improving outcomes in this at-risk population.

Nagasriya Ramisetty – Adaptation of the Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework for Asian American Mental Health Stigma and Reported Impact on Help-Seeking Behaviors

Background: Asian Americans face the highest mental health support need of any ethnic group in the United States, but the community reports severe underutilization of available mental healthcare services. Cultural differences are a major factor that contribute to differences in the help-seeking behaviors of Asian Americans, and researchers need to delineate the unique needs of this community to adapt and establish more culturally sensitive resources and outreach methods.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive narrative review of the Google Scholar database for research studies (n=19) that inform the relationship between Asian American mental health and different dimensions of the Health Stigma and Discrimination (HSD) Framework – drivers and facilitators of stigma, manifestations of stigma experiences and practices, outcomes for affected populations and organizations, and the health and social impacts. The HSD framework has the potential to navigate the nuances of mental healthcare need for Asian Americans as a global cross-cutting measure that identifies the various facets of health stigma and impacts on public health outreach and interventions in marginalized communities. This framework critically moves away from the binary of the “stigmatized” and “stigmatizer”, and instead identifies how stigma detrimentally affects the health outcomes of the community at large.

Results: Studies (Table 1) found that Asian Americans’ evaluation of personal mental health need fell outside of the Western model of mental health understanding, resulting in lower service usage rates despite awareness of them. Major factors affecting help-seeking behavior included fear of social judgement, different manifestations of and language regarding mental distress, shame, familial pressure, and, unique to the Asian American community, expectations of success without struggle due to internalization of the model minority myth (Figure 1).

Conclusions: This evidence defends the need for culturally sensitive mental healthcare resources that acknowledge and dismantle the internal, perceived, and experienced stigma for members of the Asian American community. We are conducting semi-structured interviews with community members and healthcare providers to better understand representations of mental distress and identify the specific barriers that limit resource usage. Future research can be applied to tailoring existing resources and outreach to improve mental health outcomes for Asian Americans.

Shivam Bhargava – Evaluating the Impact of Social Support in South Asians and Arabs with Type 2 Diabetes Through a Family-Centered Diabetes Education Program

Background: Diabetes is the fourth leading cause of death among Asians in Chicago, and the top leading cause of death among Asian Indians. Limited research investigates the role that social support plays in South Asians with Type 2 Diabetes. The All One Community Program is a diabetes management program tailored toward South Asian and Arab communities with social support aspects, adapted from existing evidence-based curricula. The program is led by Asian Health Coalition in Chicago in collaboration with three different community-based organizations that serve South Asian and Arab immigrant communities.

Materials and Methods: The program is culturally and linguistically tailored for the South Asian and Arab community and includes health literacy components related to nutrition, stress, and exercise. The program includes 13 educational sessions that are held one hour per week. Biometric data (blood pressure, BMI, and A1c) is collected at baseline, 3-months, 6-months, and 9-months. Since the launch of the program in 2022, 142 individuals have been enrolled with 87 individuals being diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes. A survey is administered at baseline, 6-months, and 9-months that contain questions about social support related to exercise, eating, and family/friends. Social support strategies include one on one weekly check-ins with CHWs, monthly webinars with healthcare professionals, and an interactive WhatsApp group for participants to interact and support each other outside of class.

Results: 54% of participants increased their overall social support scores from the start of the program to the end 9 months later. 67% of diabetic participants increased their social support for exercise score from baseline to 9 months. Social support for eating scores increased by an average of 5.3 points for participants from baseline to 9 months. 54% of participants increased the number of days they were physically active during the week from baseline to 9 months. A total of 98.8 pounds were lost among participants from baseline to 9 months.

Conclusion: The data analyzed informs attendees about the key roles that family members, community health workers, and additional support systems play in the management of diabetes. The research also highlights that when individuals have their family members or other support system members making the same lifestyle changes that they are, it positively impacts their motivation, behavior, and habits related to their type 2 diabetes.

Elizabeth Nguyen – Asians Be Checked: Uncovering Knowledge Deficits for Hepatitis B Among Vietnamese and Filipinos in South Texas

Background: Asian Americans are disproportionately at high risk for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. In 2021, the CDC reported that although Asian Americans comprise only 6% of the US population, they make up 60% of chronic HBV cases and are nine times more likely to die from HBV-related complications than Caucasians. Hence, we created a community advocacy project to address this disparity by providing education and promoting screening to the Asian American community.

Our community assessments reveal that among South Texas Vietnamese, over 88% reported having never been screened or being unaware of their screening status. Subsequent assessments among Chinese and Korean communities showed that over 44% of participants have never been screened for HBV. These statistics highlight disparities in hepatitis B awareness. In 2023, the CDC updated its guidelines to include universal HBV screening, emphasizing the need to bridge gaps in care. The aim of this study is to engage stakeholders by evaluating understanding of HBV among the Vietnamese and Filipinos in South Texas.

Methods: Students volunteered with Vietnamese (Lien Hoa Buddhist Temple and Vietnamese Martyrs Church) and Filipino (Philippine American Chamber of Commerce and Filipino and Pacific Islander Festival) community partners at local events. Participants responded to an online survey with the questions: 1) Are Asian Americans at higher risk for hepatitis and liver cancer? 2) Do you know what hepatitis B is? 3) Is hepatitis B preventable? 4) Is hepatitis B treatable? 5) Have you ever been screened for hepatitis B? 6) Are you interested in being screened for hepatitis B? The responses formed the basis of the education talking points, and informational flyers (Figure 1) summarizing HBV education were provided. The collected data were analyzed for descriptive statistics.

Results: Most participants (59%, n=87) did not know that Asian Americans are at higher risk for HBV. 41% lacked awareness of HBV itself and 60% were unfamiliar with chronic HBV complications, such as liver disease and cancer. 53% did not know HBV is preventable and treatable. After learning about the vaccine, 66% expressed interest in learning more and getting screened.

Conclusions: The low HBV health literacy among Vietnamese and Filipino participants underscores the need for more outreach and education. Their strong interest in screening emphasizes the importance of providing these services to address this disparity.

Eugene Oh and Hayoung Anh – Addressing Bias and Advancing Equity for AANHPI Communities in Healthcare

Background: Racism, discrimination, and bias against Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) individuals persist in healthcare, creating barriers to career advancement and impacting well-being1. Despite progress in equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI), AAPI healthcare workers face unique challenges such as being perceived as submissive, which excludes them from leadership opportunities2. At UCLA Health, concerns from AAPI community members prompted surveys to assess these issues and develop actionable solutions.

Materials & Methods: Two Qualtrics surveys were distributed to the AAPI community at UCLA Health: the first in Oct-Nov 2022 (N=127) and the second in Dec 2023-Feb 2024 (N=106). Respondents included faculty (69%), medical students (21%), staff (6%), and residents/fellows (3%). The surveys assessed experiences of racism, discrimination, and bias, and perceptions of UCLA’s response.

Results: Key findings from the 2023 survey revealed that 74% of respondents witnessed racism, discrimination, or bias against AAPI individuals (vs. 70% in 2022), and 71% personally experienced such incidents (vs. 60% in 2022). Common forms of bias included implicit bias (witnessed by 89%, experienced by 84%) and microaggressions (witnessed by 82%, experienced by 64%). Negative impacts on well-being increased to 55% (vs. 38% in 2022), and 32% considered leaving UCLA due to these experiences. Only 41% felt UCLA addressed bias effectively, and 27% felt leadership was sufficiently educated on AAPI-specific issues.

Conclusions: Despite ongoing EDI efforts, these findings highlight persistent challenges and a critical need for AAPI-specific initiatives to address bias and promote inclusion in healthcare. In response, UCLA Health has taken meaningful steps, including the recent launch of the DGSOM Center for Asian Equity and Health, which provides training for faculty, staff, and students, fosters junior faculty leadership, and lays a foundation for a supportive environment and research. A coalition of faculty and trainees is also capturing real-life stories of discrimination to create a training video raising awareness and addressing AAPI racism, now in its final stages with plans for widespread distribution. These efforts underscore the importance of systemic interventions—by implementing targeted training, encouraging open conversations, and uniting the AAPI community, academic institutions can create environments where AAPI individuals feel supported, valued, and empowered.

Anthony Trieu, Joyce Xiong, and Joanna Sung – Primary Asian Language and Risk of Hepatic Complications in Asian Americans with Chronic Hepatitis B: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) affects Asian Americans disproportionately, yet the role of language proficiency in health outcomes remains understudied.1-2 Limited English proficiency may contribute to varied outcomes through healthcare access, communication, and treatment adherence barriers.3-4 This study investigates the impact of Asian primary language preferences on adverse outcomes in Asian Americans with CHB.

Methods: Using the TriNetX platform, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of Asian American patients diagnosed with CHB (ICD-10: B18.1), excluding those with co-infection by the hepatitis D virus (ICD-10: B18.2) and Type 2 diabetes (ICD-10: E11). Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on primary language preference: English vs. certain Asian languages (Vietnamese, Korean, or Chinese). 10-year risk of key adverse outcomes, including liver cell carcinoma (ICD-10: C22.0), fibrosis and cirrhosis of liver (ICD-10: K74), liver transplant status (ICD-10: Z94.4) and portal hypertension (ICD-10: K76.6) were analyzed across language groups. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for age and gender. Certain social factors and laboratory values to assess the severity of hepatitis could not be accounted for due to limitations to available data.

Results: Preliminary findings revealed differences in adverse outcomes based on language preference. Chinese-speaking patients demonstrated a decreased risk of adverse outcomes compared to their English-speaking counterparts, specifically in liver transplant status, cirrhosis, and portal hypertension. Vietnamese- and Korean-speaking patients exhibited a significantly higher risk of liver cell carcinoma. However, no significant differences were observed in liver transplant status, portal hypertension, or cirrhosis. Differences persisted after propensity score matching.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that primary language preference may influence health outcomes in Asian Americans with CHB. Factors such as varied disease management education in non-English languages, cultural awareness, and public health programs domestically and/or countries of origin may contribute to different outcomes for certain groups.5-7 Future studies may explore the intersection of language proficiency, social support, and socioeconomic factors to better address disparities in CHB outcomes.

Avni Varshneya  – Health Education as Harm Reduction for Clients in Addiction Recovery

Background: First Step Home (FSH) is an addiction treatment facility for people who identify as women recovering from substance use disorder (SUD). Higher levels of health knowledge and literacy can increase quality of life and mental health in this community. FSH was seeking to empower their clients through health education and learn more about the impact of a new adulterant, xylazine.

Materials and Methods: A 15-session educational course was conducted on sexual/mental health, nutrition/exercise, xylazine/harm reduction, and wound care/first aid. Pre and post-session quizzes were analyzed with a Wilcoxon signed-rank t-test to assess knowledge improvement. Gathered client feedback on health education sessions. Distributed a qualitative and quantitative survey to determine how xylazine impacts FSH residents.

Results: An average 14% increase in post-quizzes compared to the pre-quizzes was found (σ = .100, n = 8). The session on wound care and first aid showed a statistically significant improvement of 27% (p = .0312, σ = .163). Through the xylazine impact study, 28 clients were surveyed. One-third of women reported being impacted by xylazine or knowing someone else who was impacted. 50% of the clients surveyed did not know what xylazine was, and 89.3% did not know the effects of xylazine on the body or how to take care of xylazine wounds.

Conclusion: Women reported being empowered to make decisions about their healthcare and schedule reproductive health screenings after the educational course. More participants are needed to demonstrate a significant link between health education improving health knowledge for women undergoing SUD treatment. Wound care and first aid sessions showed significant increases in scores. These skills should continue to be taught because they are vital to saving the lives of people with SUD. The results of the xylazine impact survey show a striking lack of awareness about xylazine amongst clients. If clients did know what xylazine was, they often did not know about wound care or how the drug affected the body. Notably, some clients had healed wounds and only realized they may be due to xylazine as they were taking the survey. These results indicate more education is needed to equip women in addiction recovery with knowledge about harmful adulterants like xylazine, and empower them with sessions on first aid, harm reduction, and wound care techniques.

Gabriella Tran – Investigating Quality of Life Measures in Birdshot Chorioretinopathy

Background: Birdshot chorioretinopathy (BSCR) is a chronic posterior uveitis that can significantly impact visual function. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have gained importance in evaluating the impact of patients’ perceptions of their quality of life. This study aimed to investigate the use of psychometrically validated PRO measures, the Michigan Retinal Degeneration Questionnaire (MRDQ) and Michigan Vision-related Anxiety Questionnaire (MVAQ), for BSCR patients.

Methods: A dual-center mixed method observational study was conducted on patients with BSCR (n=21). The MRDQ and MVAQ were administered to these patients, and retrospective chart review was performed. Graded response models were fit by Cai’s Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro algorithm using the R (version 3.6.3) package mirtscores for seven parameters from the MRDQ. These scores were then compared with the presence or absence of retinal vasculitis and the time between diagnosis and the most recent follow-up.

Results: Analysis of the MRDQ parameters revealed previously unrecognized patterns in visual function among birdshot chorioretinopathy (BSCR) patients. Photosensitivity with a value of 0.73 ± 1.3 and color vision with a value of 0.66 ± 0.11 were the highest scoring domains. The lowest scoring domains were mesopic peripheral function at 0.059 ± 0.09 and scotopic function 0.082 ± 0.10. A trend of retinal vasculitis impacting color vision and photosensitivity was observed. Interestingly, a significant correlation between time from diagnosis to most recent follow-up being ≥5 years and decreased photosensitivity was observed (p=0.017). MVAQ showed higher anxiety due to cone dysfunction scores, compared to rod dysfunction, further supporting that color vision is one of the most greatly impacted domains for birdshot patients.

Conclusions: The MRDQ/MVAQ results provide a previously unrecognized feature of birdshot, which is a significant impact on color vision. The domains most affected in BSCR are notably different from those reported in retinitis pigmentosa (RP). In RP, the highest observed MRDQ scores were mesopic peripheral function and contrast sensitivity, while the lowest were in photosensitivity and color vision. Both RP and BSCR affect photoreceptors, but these results indicate potential differences in pathophysiologic processes.

Hanna Suh, Sophie Lu – Investigating the Health Needs of Asiatown Community Members in Cleveland, Ohio

Background: The Asian and Pacific Islander community comprise 2.5% of Cleveland’s and 3.5% of Cuyahoga county’s population according to the 2020 census. The health needs of this community, however, are not well characterized. The aim of this study was to assess the subjective factors that affect health needs and outcomes, self-efficacy, and healthcare interactions among Cleveland’s Asiatown members.

Methods: We administered a survey to Asiatown members asking about barriers to healthcare, health literacy and transportation. Surveys were provided in English, simplified Chinese, traditional Chinese, and Korean. Responses were collected in-person at community health outreach events and online via Qualtrics. Data analyses, including t-tests with unequal variances and Fisher’s exact tests were conducted in R.

Results: We enrolled 78 participants with a mean age of 72, of which there were 60 females and 14 males (4 NA). Self-reported race was 77 Asians and 1 mixed race, with 74 Chinese, 4 Koreans, and 1 White/Chinese. The top two health concerns were blood pressure and diabetes with 36 and 19 votes respectively. 75 participants (96%) had health insurance. Most participants either drove themselves (37.2%) or were driven by others (24.4%). The primary mode of transportation of participants ages 65 and older was significantly different from those younger than 65 (p=0.002). While both groups reported driving themselves, those aged 65 and older were driven by others more often. Regarding time spent traveling to health care visits, most participants spent 10-30 minutes. Lastly, 53.8% of participants said they go to health appointments alone versus 41% who go with others (4 NA). There were no significant differences in responses based on sex.

Conclusions: Our results suggest unmet health needs of a population of elderly community members who live in Asiatown. While participants tend to have health insurance, there appear to be other barriers to health care, such as transportation insecurity and lack of social support. Limitations of this study include a small sample size as well as limited literacy in their primary language among some participants which may bias results. Future directions include tailoring future health fairs and volunteer programs to address the gaps identified in this study, such as providing transportation support.

Hao Chen – Reassessing the Healthy Immigrant Effect: Elevated Chronic Disease Prevalence Among Asian Immigrants Compared to U.S.-Born Asians

Introduction: The “healthy immigrant effect” suggests that immigrants often have better health outcomes than their native-born counterparts. This study reevaluates this concept by analyzing the prevalence of chronic diseases among Asian immigrants compared to U.S.-born Asian Americans and examining healthcare access metrics to explore potential contributors to health disparities.

Methods: Data from the Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (IPUMS) National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) was used to analyze to assess the prevalence of hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cancer among individuals aged 18 and older. Foreign-born Asian immigrants were categorized by U.S. residency duration: less than one year, 1–less than 5 years, 5– less than 10 years, and more than 15 years. Healthcare access metrics, including health insurance coverage, recent doctor visits, and having a usual place of care, were also evaluated. Weighted percentages and chi-square tests were used to identify differences in prevalence and access.

Results: Among Asian immigrants, hypercholesterolemia and hypertension prevalence initially declined with longer residency—from 25.0% and 16.8% (less than one year) to 16.7% and 10.8% (5– less than 10 years)—but rose to 36.7% for both conditions after 15 years. Similarly, cancer and diabetes prevalence were 0% (less than one year), fluctuating between 1 and 15 years, and 4.6% and 15.2%, for over 15 years, respectively.

Healthcare access improved with residency duration, with insurance coverage rising from 86.3% to 97.8%, and having a usual place of care increasing from 42.6% to 91.5%. However, recent doctor visits declined (89.3% to 85.5%). Compared to U.S.-born Asians, foreign-born Asian immigrants reported higher prevalence of chronic conditions, including cancer (3.9% vs. 2.4%), hypercholesterolemia (30.6% vs. 19.6%), hypertension (29.3% vs. 16.7%), and diabetes (12.4% vs. 3.9%).

Conclusion: This study challenges the “healthy immigrant effect,” showing higher chronic disease prevalence among foreign-born Asian immigrants than U.S.-born Asians, including recent arrivals. These disparities are unlikely driven by socioeconomic barriers, as healthcare access metrics were comparable. Potential contributors include language barriers, acculturation stress, pre-existing conditions, or lifestyle changes. Future research should explore these disparities’ underlying causes and guide targeted interventions.

Himi Begum – Cervical Cancer Incidence Patterns Across Asian and Pacific Islander Populations in the U.S. (2004–2021)

Background: Cervical cancer remains a major public health issue, with significant differences in diagnosis and survival rates across racial and ethnic groups. Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander (NHAPI) women represent a diverse population, with unique challenges in accessing care and timely diagnosis. This poses a significant public health problem, given that cancer is the leading cause of death among Asian American women. This study aims to examine disparities in cervical cancer stage at diagnosis and incidence rates among API women, utilizing Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data from 2004 to 2021.

Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of cervical cancer cases recorded in the SEER*Stat database from 2004 to 2021. Data were stratified by race and ethnicity, focusing on specific NHAPI subgroups (e.g., Vietnamese, Korean, Japanese, Chinese, Filipino). We compared stage at diagnosis (i.e., Localized, Regional, Distant), age-adjusted incidence rates, and mortality rates between NHAPI subgroups and non-Hispanic White women.

Results: Overall, the 5-year cervical cancer incidence rates for NHAPI women were generally lower than those for non-Hispanic White women, except for Native Hawaiian women (6.1 per 100,000 vs. 6.9 per 100,000). The 5-year age-adjusted mortality rates were lower for NHAPI women compared to non-Hispanic White women (1.6 per 100,000 vs. 2.1 per 100,000). In general, certain API groups had less favorable distributions of stage at diagnosis compared to non-Hispanic White women. Among stratified NHAPI subgroups, Chinese and Filipino women had the highest rates of late-stage cervical cancer diagnoses.

Conclusions: This study highlights disparities in cervical cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis between specific NHAPI subgroups and non-Hispanic White women. The higher rates of late-stage diagnoses among Chinese and Filipino women underscore the need for targeted cancer prevention measures. These findings demonstrate the importance of understanding the unique health challenges across NHAPI groups to improve outcomes.

Isabel Kilroy –  Built Environment and Housing Quality on Mental Health Outcomes Among Filipinos in the HoPES Cohort

Background: The rising prevalence of mental health issues is a global public health concern. A social determinants approach to mental health highlights that the conditions in which individuals live, work, and grow shape mental health outcomes. Housing is a cardinal social determinant of health, and recent research has emphasized the impact of the built environment (including housing quality and urban design) on well-being. The Philippines, ranked third in mental illness prevalence in the Western Pacific, faces a housing crisis worsened by socioeconomic inequality and climate disaster. Thus, exploring the impact of the built environment on Filipino mental health is crucial. Filipino Americans comprise the 3rd largest Asian ethnic subgroup in the U.S., and Asians are projected to be the largest immigrant group in the U.S. by 2055. Within this community, mental health stigma and cultural values often discourage formal help-seeking, despite high rates of psychological distress. Therefore, identifying “upstream factors” such as housing and the built environment is critical to addressing the mental health needs of Filipino Americans and AANHPI more broadly. Materials and

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of baseline data from the non-migrant sample of the Health of Philippine Emigrants Study (HoPES; n=805). Using multiple linear regression and logistic regression analyses, we examined the association between built environment quality and depressive symptoms, and the impact of built environment quality on substance use, specifically cigarette use and binge drinking.

Results: Overall, poor quality built environment was significantly associated with greater depressive symptoms (β = 0.079, p = 0.013) and smoking (β = 0.13, p = 0.0013), but not binge drinking (β = -0.058, p = 0.115) after adjusting for covariates.

Conclusion: Clinicians across all specialties play a key role in recognizing the impact of housing quality and the built environment on mental health. Integrating this awareness into medical training, incorporating questions on built environment within clinical assessment, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, especially with public health and social work fields, are essential steps to addressing the impact of built environment on mental health outcomes in the Filipino community. Ultimately, advocating for healthier policies that improve the conditions in which patients live, work, and grow is vital to optimizing community health outcomes.

Rachel Prince – The Role of Asian Culture and Language in Diabetes and Vision Care

Background: Asians face high rates of diabetes and diabetic retinopathy (DR) and have disproportionately low diabetes screening rates but are underrepresented in vision research, with distinct ethnicities often aggregated. We investigated the role of language and cultural preferences in shaping the understanding and management of diabetes and eye care by analyzing perspectives across Asian subgroups.

Methods: We conducted virtual semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of Asian-identifying, English-speaking adults with diabetes residing in Connecticut. We created an interview guide based on our DR determinants framework. All interviews were transcribed and analyzed using NVivo software.  We conducted consensus-based coding and both deductive and inductive thematic analysis until we achieved thematic saturation.

Results: We recruited 10 participants with diabetes (median age 65.9 years, 60% female) of Chinese, Filipino, Indian, and Vietnamese ethnicities. We identified 27 concepts under eight themes: cues to action, cultural understanding, diabetes management, health awareness, knowledge-creating experiences, patient education, physician-patient interaction, and vision status. Over half the participants stated they were not made aware of the link between eye health and diabetes or the rationale behind diabetic eye exams. Participants preferred providers of similar ethnicities due to a shared understanding of diet, lifestyle, and language, which improved comprehension and management of their health conditions. They also cited diet, lifestyle, and cultural beliefs as key challenges of managing diabetes, emphasizing the need for cultural integration into health management plans. Participants also generated ideas for improved communication with patients with limited English proficiency. While the original framework examined broad factors influencing DR screening, our study focused on cultural and linguistic influences on diabetes and eye health in Asians.

Conclusions: Participants recognize the need for cultural understanding from providers, especially in regard to patient education and diabetes management. It is crucial to develop interventions tailored to Asian communities that emphasize the link between diabetes and eye health and address cultural and language barriers.

Sandhya Sewnauth – The Impact of Colonialism on Present-Day Indo-Caribbean Health

Background: Indo-Caribbeans are currently the fifth largest immigrant group in New York City, and the second largest immigrant population in the borough of Queens. There are several significant health disparities that exist within this community, including elevated rates of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and binge drinking. To develop culturally appropriate and trauma-informed strategies to address this, we need to understand the complex historical factors that led to disproportionate health outcomes. By analyzing colonialism as a social determinant of health, we can create sustainable healthcare improvements within this under-researched population of the South Asian diaspora.

Methods: Existing literature on present-day health disparities was assessed using PubMed and Research Open World databases. A community health resources and needs assessment conducted by the NYU Center for the Study of Asian American Health from 2013-2015 was also consulted. Primary sources from the colonial period were accessed at the British Library in London, UK.

Results: The Indian indenture system contributed to several health disparities in the Indo-Caribbean population. This includes the cardiometabolic effects of colonial-driven famines that devastated the regions of India where the majority of indentured laborers were recruited. The economy in the Caribbean colonies focused solely on sugar cultivation, which influenced the diet and lifestyle of this population, including the high number of distilleries in their communities. The experiences of working as indentured laborers also led to mental health crises, including suicidal ideation, and generational trauma among the diaspora.

Conclusions: The health of Indo-Caribbean immigrants is uniquely affected by the legacy of the indentured laborer system during British colonial rule. These results will inform a culturally appropriate and trauma-informed resource guide that focuses on the topics of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, alcohol use disorder, and mental health. While more research is needed on present-day health disparities within this population, tailored resource guides will empower community members to tackle negative health outcomes, enabling future generations to thrive.

Arion Yu – The acute effects of alpha-lactalbumin intake on tryptophan metabolites and mood in older adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment

Background: Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) represents a transitional stage between normal cognitive aging and more severe neurodegenerative disorders in the elderly such as Alzheimer’s Disease. MCI is often accompanied by depressed mood and other mood disturbances which can obfuscate what is causing declining cognition. Serotonin (5-HT), a neurotransmitter involved in regulating mood, is synthesized from the essential amino acid tryptophan. Availability of serotonin is largely influenced by the metabolism of tryptophan through either the serotonin or kynurenine pathway. This manuscript explores the potential relationship between MCI, depressed mood, and tryptophan metabolism in the elderly, with a particular focus on the effects of a tryptophan-rich dietary intervention. We first examine the differences in tryptophan metabolism between MCI elderly adults and healthy older adults at baseline. Subsequently, we examine how intake of alpha-lactalbumin (ALAC), a protein rich in tryptophan, affects tryptophan metabolism and if it could serve as an effective strategy for enhancing mood in older adults with mild cognitive impairment.

Methods: 32 older adults (age 55 and up) with MCI and 26 older adults matched for age, sex, and BMI without MCI participated in this cross sectional study. Serum tryptophan metabolites at baseline were measured. A smaller subset of these subjects then consumed a meal enriched with ALAC. Plasma tryptophan metabolites after introduction of the meal were measured and changes in mood were assessed before and after meal intake.

Results: MCI subjects had higher levels of plasma anthranilic acid at baseline. Intake of ALAC resulted in an increase in plasma tryptophan (TRP), kynurenine (KYN) , 3-hydroxykynurenine (3-HK), anthranilic acid (AA), kynurenic acid (KYNA), and picolinic acid (PICO). There were no differences in 5-HT before and after ALAC intake. Additionally, there was a MCI interaction with picolinic acid. The TRP/LNAA ratio increased by 89.9% in MCI subjects and 95.9% in controls. There were no acute changes in mood before and after ALAC intake.

Conclusions: Elderly adults with MCI have different tryptophan metabolism down the kynurenine pathway. Consumption of a dietary protein rich in tryptophan increases metabolites of the kynurenine pathway as well as the TRP/LNAA ratio. The ALAC protein had no effect on mood.

Brandon Deguzman – Underdiagnosis of Trauma and PTSD in a Low-Income, Minority-Predominant Outpatient Setting: A Comparison of Self-Assessments and Medical Records

Background: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a debilitating psychiatric condition that can result from traumatic events. It is characterized by intrusive thoughts, avoidance, and mood changes, and often complicated by several common comorbidities, including major depression and substance use disorders. PTSD has a lifetime prevalence of 9.4% in the United States but is often under- or mis-diagnosed. Several validated screening tools and structured assessments exist to detect trauma and PTSD, but their efficacy has not been well studied in low income, inner-city outpatient settings, in which trauma tends to be highly prevalent. The current study evaluated if validated self-report measures would capture the prevalence and trauma elements of PTSD more accurately than standard clinical interviews. The study characterized the demographics of an inner-city outpatient population, PTSD prevalence, comorbidities, and treatment.

Materials and Methods: A survey was conducted of 100 adult outpatients being treated at a large inner-city psychiatric clinic. This clinic provides safety-net services for an otherwise unserved, mostly minority population in Los Angeles County. Each participant completed two self-report measures: Life Events Checklist for DSM-5-Extended (LEC-5) and the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Patient responses to the measures were then compared to corresponding data extracted from a medical chart review.

Results: Of the 100 participants, 50 were male, 50 were female, 66 self-identified as Latine/x, and 79 were unmarried. Physical assault (60%), transportation accidents (57%), and other unwanted sexual experiences (47%) were the most frequently reported traumas. The most commonly endorsed symptoms were feeling upset when reminded of the trauma (68%), insomnia (68%), and difficulty concentrating (66%). 56 participants met criteria for a provisional DSM-5 PTSD diagnosis, but only 29 indicated a PTSD diagnosis in their medical records. The PCL-5 and the medical record demonstrated fair agreement in PTSD diagnosis (Kappa = 0.219; SE of kappa = 0.082). A significant difference was found between the LEC-5 and the medical record in capturing the number of trauma event categories endorsed by participants (t(99) = 13.1834, p < .0001).

Conclusions: PTSD may be underdiagnosed in outpatient settings. Implementing validated self-report trauma screening measures may improve identification and treatment of PTSD among historically underserved populations.

John Huang – Evaluating Diurnal Responses to Timolol and Latanoprost from iCare HOME Intraocular Pressure Data

Background: Current glaucoma management relies on trial-and error with intraocular pressure (IOP) measured only during office hours. This limits our understanding of drug responses over a diurnal period. iCare HOME, a self-tonometer, may address this issue. This study examined timolol and latanoprost responders using diurnal IOP data from iCare HOME via cosinor rhythmometry.

Methods: Forty-seven subjects (22 male, mean age 61±9 years) with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma, were enrolled in a randomized, crossover trial of latanoprost and timolol. IOP was measured using pneumatonometry and iCare IC200 at 3 of 6 study visits: baseline, after 1 week of first treatment, and after 1 week of second treatment. Subjects measured their IOP with iCare HOME at least 6 times daily for 1 week before visits. Eyes were labeled responders to timolol or latanoprost if IOP decreased ≥15% from baseline. Diurnal IOP data were analyzed and modeled with cosinor rhythmometry using R (Figure 1).

Results: For timolol, iCare HOME and pneumatonometry identified the same eye as a responder or non-responder in 60.4% of eyes (n=53). For latanoprost, the two tonometers agreed in 69.6% of eyes (n=56). Agreement between iCare HOME and iCare IC200 occurred in 54.5% of eyes (n=55) for timolol and 62.1% of eyes (n=58) for latanoprost (Figure 2). The chi-squared test for independence revealed that classifications of latanoprost responders between iCare HOME and the clinic tonometers, pneumatonometry (p=0.0025) and iCare IC200 (p=0.0137), were significantly different. No such difference was found with timolol responder classification.

Conclusions: When determining timolol responders, home and clinic tonometers show comparable classifications. For latanoprost, significant differences in classifications highlight discrepancies between home and clinic tonometry, suggesting that incorporating 24-hour monitoring may impact classifications. iCare HOME may improve glaucoma management by capturing IOP fluctuations to better identify responders.

Juben Angelo Saez – The angiotensin (1-7) glycopeptide PNA5 reduces cognitive dysfunction in a chronic progressive mouse model of Parkinson’s disease through modulation of neuroinflammation

Parkinson Disease (PD) is a widespread disease, however treatment primarily focuses on resolution of motor symptoms with currently no therapeutics that aim to accurately improve cognitive decline associated with PD. It has been shown in previous studies that MAS receptor agonism via glycosylated angiotensin (1-7) peptide, PNA5, effectively reduces cognitive decline in models of vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID). The two goals of this study were to determine if systemic administration of PNA5 decreased cognitive decline in a PD mouse model and to determine if improved cognitive status can be correlated to histopathological or blood-plasma changes. Mice over-expressing human, wild-type α-synuclein (αSyn) under the Thy1 promoter (Thy1-αSyn- mice), were used as a model of PD with cognitive decline. Beginning at 4 months of age, Thy1-αSyn mice were treated with a systemic dose of PNA5 or saline solution (1 mg/kg/day). Thy1-αSyn mice then underwent behavioral testing at 6 months of age which included Y-maze, nest building, open field test, novel object recognition, and challenging beam test. Thy1-αSyn- mice were compared with wild-type mice treated with saline. Mice brains were then analyzed for changes to brain pathology using immunohistochemistry, microscopy and image analysis, stereology, Western blot, and plasma collection and immunoassay. Treatment with PNA5 reversed cognitive dysfunction measured by Novel Object Recognition and spontaneous alteration in a Y-maze in Thy1-αSyn mice. PNA5 treatment was specific to cognitive deficits as the number of errors per step on the challenging beam and nestlet building test did not change between Thy1-αSyn mice and WT. With analysis of brain tissue, enhanced cognition was associated with decreases in hippocampal inflammation and reductions in circulating levels of Macrophage Induced Protein (MIP-1β), a chemokine implicated in cognitive decline. Neuronal loss was also blunted within the CA3 hippocampal region of PNA5-treated αsyn mice. This data reveals that PNA5 treatment reduces cognitive dysfunction in a mouse model of PD and that MIP-1β can be used as a candidate biomarker for future target engagement.

Liana Ysabel Bautista – Pain Perception in Patients with Comorbid Fibromyalgia, ADHD and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Undergoing Treatment with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a syndrome of chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain with serious adverse health and economic outcomes (1,2). FM is not well understood, but ongoing research suggests that it is a disorder of pain regulation. It is specifically thought that central sensitization results in pain hypersensitivity. Patients experience chronic pain in the absence of musculoskeletal inflammation and structural damage (3). Moreover, there is a high frequency of ADHD symptoms and diagnosis among patients with FM, and improvement in sleep may improve not only pain but also executive function (4). For some patients with ADHD, symptoms are worsened by sleep disturbance due to OSA, and symptoms are markedly improved with appropriate treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (5). Because sleep (and especially REM sleep) deprivation increases central sensitization, it stands to reason that for patients with FM and OSA, appropriate treatment of OSA will lead to improvement in pain perception and neuropsychiatric sequelae (5-9).

Aims:  Examine the relationship of pain perception between three commonly comorbid disorders: Fibromyalgia (FM), Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA), and Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). We specifically aim to examine the effect of CPAP treatment on attention in patients with comorbid FM and OSA

Methods:  After IRB approval, FM patients with OSA were identified. After written informed consent, ASRS-v1.1 was administered to FM patients seen at Loyola Outpatient center. McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) 11 was administered. We analyzed sleep studies and divided the FM patients into 3 groups 1.Mild OSA 2. Moderate OSA 3. Severe OSA based on apnea/hypopnea index (AHI). We then identified OSA patients undergoing CPAP treatment and analyzed their ASRS score and compared ASRS score to non CPAP patients. REM rebound scores were analyzed.

Results: With MPQ of +25 signifying severe pain.

ADHD positive n = 24

ADHD positive and Severe MPQ Score n= 16 MPQ mean score ADHD positive: 27.67 ADHD CPAP Compliance: 44%

ADHD negative n = 26

ADHD positive and Severe MPQ Score n = 7 MPQ mean score ADHD negative: 19.23 ADHD CPAP Compliance: 55%

Conclusion: Findings show that there is a correlation between a positive ADHD diagnosis and having a more severe pain perception regarding FM symptoms. With regards to CPAP compliance, which could be influencing pain perception in these patients, we saw the ADHD positive group was less compliant.

Manav Jain – Assessment of Plasma Tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) Levels in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis: An Exploratory Study

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex neurological disease with varied clinical presentations. Oxidative stress is a key contributor to MS pathogenesis, characterized by the overproduction of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, resulting in neurotoxicity and disease progression. Tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), a cofactor for nitric oxide synthase, is vital for redox homeostasis. BH4 depletion amplifies oxidative stress, disrupting nitric oxide synthesis. Prior research indicates that reduced BH4 levels correlate with oxidative stress-related pathologies. This study investigates BH4 as a potential non-invasive biomarker for MS diagnosis, hypothesizing lower BH4 levels in MS patients compared to healthy controls.

Materials and Methods: This proof-of-concept study recruited MS patients (relapsing-remitting MS [RRMS], secondary-progressive MS [SPMS], primary-progressive MS [PPMS], and clinically isolated syndrome [CIS]) and healthy controls. Inclusion criteria were ages 18–40, BMI <28.5, ambulatory status (EDSS <3.5), and informed consent. Exclusions included significant systemic diseases, pregnancy, and recent smoking or medication use. Plasma BH4 levels were quantified via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Stabilization agents included dithiothreitol, ascorbic acid, and trichloroacetic acid. Samples were centrifuged, snap-frozen, and stored at −80°C. Statistical analyses employed independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests for non-normal data.

Results: Pilot data from 20 plasma samples revealed reduced BH4 levels in MS patients (6 ± 2 ng/mL) compared to controls (7.7 ± 2 ng/mL, p < 0.01, Cohen’s d). Reduced BH4 levels were observed in young, mobile RRMS patients with mild disability (EDSS <3.5), stable disease, no comorbidities, and no smoking or excessive alcohol use. Participants were predominantly on high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies.

Conclusions: Preliminary findings highlight BH4’s potential as a sensitive biomarker for oxidative stress in MS, independent of clinical stability or radiological findings. This study underscores the importance of integrating molecular biomarkers like BH4 with traditional markers (e.g., MRI, neurofilaments, GFAP) to enhance MS management and individualized treatment strategies. Ongoing recruitment aims to validate these findings across diverse MS phenotypes.

Charles Guo – Suppression of Integrin-Linked Kinase Inhibits SPARC’s Effect on Extracellular Matrix and Intraocular Pressure

Background: Primary open-angle glaucoma is a progressive eye disease where aqueous humor is inadequately drained from the trabecular meshwork (TM). While the exact mechanism is still unknown, Secreted Protein, Acidic and Rich in Cysteine (SPARC) is shown to be a key regulator of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins that elevate intraocular pressure (IOP). Integrin-Linked Kinase (ILK) is a membrane-bound kinase shown to interact with SPARC and also regulate the ECM. We overexpressed SPARC and then inhibited ILK in mice and human models to investigate the pathway of how SPARC regulates ECM proteins in the trabecular meshwork (TM). We hypothesize that SPARC mediates its effect through ILK.

Materials and Methods: Live mice eyes, human cadaveric anterior segments, and primary human TM cells were treated with an adenovirus carrying cDNA of human SPARC (Ad.SPARC) causing overexpression and a lentivirus carrying shRNA targeting ILK (shILK) to inhibit ILK. IOP measurements were performed on live mice eyes and human anterior segments. TM cells were analyzed by immunoblotting and immunostaining. Statistical analysis was performed in Prism.

Results: SPARC overexpression in mice increased IOP compared to baseline by 1.61±0.94mmHg (p=0.047, n=10). Subsequent shRNA-mediated ILK inhibition reduced IOP by 3.51±0.92mmHg (p=0.009, n=8) compared to SPARC overexpression. In human anterior segments, SPARC overexpression elevated IOP 2.10±0.25fold (p=0.021, n=4), however, addition of shILK attenuated SPARC’s effect and decreased IOP 0.61±0.31fold (p=0.015, n=4). In human TM cells, SPARC overexpression increased levels 3.2±2.5fold (p=0.029, n=12) and also induced elevated laminin 1.45±0.37fold (p=0.004, n=10) compared to controls. ILK inhibition reduced levels 0.54±0.17fold (p<0.001, n=12) and also reduced levels of collagen I 0.60±0.17fold (p<0.001, n=8) and collagen VI 0.67±0.17fold (p<0.001, n=8).

Conclusions: ILK inhibition by shRNA attenuated the effects of SPARC overexpression on IOP and ECM proteins, implicating ILK signaling as a major molecular pathway of SPARC-mediated regulation of ECM homeostasis in TM. ILK is important in the downstream cascade of SPARC.

Dottie Yu – Development of Multiple Myeloma-on-a-Chip for Disease Modeling

Background: A hallmark of multiple myeloma (MM) is the transformation of the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment into an immunosuppressive niche that supports the migration, proliferation, and survival of malignant cells[1–3]. Preclinical murine models and 2D/3D cell culture systems are commonly used to study MM; however, they can be limited in fully capturing the complexity of the tumor microenvironment in a human context[4]. As such, there is a need for an ex-vivo model that most accurately recapitulates the immune and stromal components of the human BM environment, especially for testing CAR T-Cell therapy.

Materials and Methods: To emulate the microarchitecture of the BM, we designed the chip with concentric chambers representing the central sinus (central inlet), medullary cavity (inner chamber), and endosteal region (middle chamber) of the bone marrow. Chips are fabricated using replica molding technique by casting polydimethylsiloxane onto silicon wafer molds, followed by hole-punching inlets and outlets, bonding onto glass coverslips, and UV sterilization. To recreate the cellular composition of the BM, we seeded the chambers with human multiple myeloma blasts, primary human umbilical endothelial cells, primary human mesenchymal stem cells, osteoblasts, and fibroblasts. The chips were cultured for 1 week and characterized by immunostaining of vessel, immune and multiple myeloma markers.

Results: Our model demonstrated key features of the BM tissue in MM, with evidence of vascularization and MM cell localization in the medullary cavity region (inner chamber). Validation was further supported by integrating scRNA-seq data from 22115 healthy, new diagnosis, and relapse MM cells. We classified the cells into 8 immune cell types and found distinct changes in gene expression between the relapse samples compared to the healthy and new diagnosis ones. We are now investigating the role of these genes in MM progression and treatment resistance in CAR T-cell therapy using our MM-on-a-Chip.

Conclusion: The MM-on-a-Chip emulates key features of the BM environment in MM and provides a novel platform for studying the cellular interactions and microenvironment evolution in disease progression. Integrating this model with scRNA-seq analysis will build on our current understanding of the immune niche in MM progression and serve as a promising avenue for preclinical testing of novel therapies.


APAMSA Merchandise Order Form: Graduation Cords

It’s that time of year: APAMSA is excited to announce that we are offering APASMA graduation cords to members! All profits from sales will go to supporting APAMSA’s mission and initiatives as a medical and pre-medical student organization dedicated to advocating for the unique health challenges of Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) communities. Visit the linked form to place an order for yourself and/or your APAMSA chapter. Please note: with graduation right around the corner, it may take approximately 3-7 business days to receive your package. Congratulations on your upcoming graduation!

Link to merch order form

Response to SAVE Act (H.R. 22)

On April 10, 2025, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 22, the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, which requires all voters to provide documented proof of citizenship in person while voting. If passed in the Senate and signed into law, this bill will create unnecessary barriers to voting and disenfranchise millions of eligible voters. 

 

Parts of the SAVE Act Who does this impact?
  1. Requiring documented proof of citizenship in the form of a birth certificate, passport, or naturalization certificate
One in 10 eligible American citizens lack these documents or face significant barriers in obtaining them.

Voters of color, married women who change their names, and young voters will be significantly affected.

Those with REAL ID, military or tribal ID would not be considered as having sufficient proof of citizenship under this new law. 

  1. Must present proof of United States citizenship to an election official for voting by mail 
Every current and new voter will have to present their proof of citizenship to election offices, which can be hours away, in order to update their registration status. This poses a significant burden for rural, disabled, and elderly citizens

This also eliminates voter registration drives and online voter registration, thus reducing voter turnout. 

  1. Remove noncitizens from registration rolls
Voting as a noncitizen is already illegal and very rare – only 30 votes out of 23.5 million votes during the 2016 general election were suspected to be made by noncitizens. 

During previous voter roll purges, almost two-thirds of suspected noncitizens in Alabama were, in fact, later found out to be eligible voters. If rolled out on a larger scale, this will unjustly disenfranchise eligible voters as already seen in Virginia during the 2024 election

 

National APAMSA strongly condemns this bill, as it will have far-reaching effects in limiting the voices of millions of Americans, especially people of color who are disproportionately affected by this potential voting law. We stand by the statements put out by organizations like ACLU and APIA Vote that echo our same concern for diminishing voting access. As mentioned by previous statements, National APAMSA recognizes that voting is a pivotal social determinant of health that underlies our ability as medical students, health advocates, and future leaders of health to serve our communities and strive for better health outcomes. 

Please contact your local Senator to express your opposition against the passage of the SAVE Act. You can use 5 Calls to quickly locate your representatives’ numbers and be prepared with prompts that can help you discuss this particular bill and other issues at ease. Other resources like When We All Vote can also streamline the process to contact the appropriate representatives.

For questions or concerns, please reach out to Brian Leung at rapidresponse@apamsa.org



Women in Medicine Conversations: Dr. Avani Patel

Dr. Avani Patel is a concierge and sports psychiatrist at her own private practice, Mississippi Psychiatry & Wellness, as well as a behavioral health medical director. In this Women in Medicine Series episode, Dr. Patel discusses the impact of growing up in rural Mississippi as an Asian Indian American, holding multiple national leadership positions throughout her medical journey, and advice for building resiliency and self-advocacy. 

Listen here:

YouTube
Spotify
Apple Podcasts 

This episode was produced by Anne Nguyen and Ashley Tam, hosted by Anne Nguyen, and graphic by Callista Wu and Claire Sun.

Time Stamps: 

00:00 Introduction to Women in Medicine Conversations: Dr. Avani Patel

00:28 Introduction to Dr. Avani Patel

03:28 Why Medicine?

05:44 Growing Up Asian Indian American in Mississippi

08:35 Work-Life Harmony

12:03 Health Equity Leadership & Cultural Competence in Mississippi

20:07 Sitting in Discomfort & Determining Your Boundaries

28:30 What Good Mentorship Looks Like

32:35 Reflections & Career Advice for Your Past Self

 

Full Transcript:

00:00 Introduction to Women in Medicine Conversations: Dr. Avani Patel

Anne: Hi everyone, this is our Women in Medicine series in the APAMSA Podcast where we dive into topics ranging from experiences as an Asian-American Native Hawaiian Pacific Islander woman in medicine,to topics like women’s health advocacy. Join us for these insightful conversations. For today’s podcast, we’ll be speaking with Dr. Avani Patel, who is a board-certified psychiatrist and community leader in her home state, Mississippi. Let’s welcome Dr. Patel. 

 

00:28 Introduction to Dr. Avani Patel

Anne: Dr. Patel, I’m very glad that you’re here with us today to share your insights about medicine and also your career and being a woman in medicine. Just as an intro question, could you start us off and tell us a little bit about yourself and also about your journey in medicine?

Dr. Avani Patel: Absolutely. Thank you so much for having me on the podcast. I’m so excited. So, I’m actually a concierge and sports psychiatrist, and I founded my own private practice called Mississippi Psychiatry and Wellness in my home state of Mississippi. I graduated from residency from the University of Mississippi Medical Center. And I actually also received my doctorate of medicine MD degree from there as well. In addition, I have a master’s in healthcare administration with emphasis on executive level leadership. So I thought I wanted to be a CEO, maybe a CMO of a hospital system, and I got that toward the end of my medical school training as well. I’ve done some additional training in sports psychiatry, I know that’s a new emerging field that people are excited about. I’m always happy to nerd out about that on another episode if it’s of interest. And so I was awarded that by the International Society of Sports Psychiatry. And so, a lot of my passion areas and the work that I do is in health equity, some consult liaison psychiatry, sports psychiatry, private practice, how to start a private practice, and what concierge care looks like, and then administrative leadership. And in terms of some of my leadership positions, which I think would be really helpful, especially as we go through training, there’s so much you can do and so much opportunity. I think it’s helpful to kind of know a little bit of that history. I actually served on my Mississippi State Medical Association Board of Trustees for six years as a medical student, as a resident. I was the first resident physician to serve on the American Medical Association Foundation Board of Directors, and I was actually invited to serve a second term. I was very involved with AMA as a medical student with some section related roles, as well as the resident fellow section. And I was actually the Vice Chair of our Committee on Business and Economics. And then now, currently with AMA, I’m on the Women’s Physicians Section Governing Council as the Young Physicians Section Representative. In addition, I completed three non-clinical fellowships throughout residency. And so, I did two in leadership and one in health equity, and I continued to serve in some of these roles, even from my specialty side of things. So I served a year on the American Psychiatric Association Board of Trustees and I was actually the Chair of the Leadership Fellowship through the American Psychiatric Association. And I also am the Senior Laughlin Fellow selected amongst my cohort, which is one of the highest honors you can receive as a trainee in the field of psychiatry through the American College of Psychiatrists. So I’ve done quite a bit of stuff from the leadership realm and as a trainee and really looking forward to continue that journey now that I’m early career. 

 

03:28 Why Medicine?

Anne: That’s great. It sounds like you have a lot of accomplishments and it’s really amazing that you’re– you’ve been really dedicated to staying and then helping out in the Mississippi area, as well as such a national scale for medicine as well. Could you tell us a little bit more about how your identity as a woman, and in addition your cultural background as someone who’s Asian American, and how that’s shaped your practice currently and also your journey in medicine?

Dr. Avani Patel: Absolutely. Thank you for that question. I think it’s so important to be proud of where we come from. And I’ll tell you, growing up in the state of Mississippi I wasn’t always proud. And in fact, I wanted to hide my background, because I felt like it wouldn’t be accepted and it wouldn’t allow me to grow in leadership. And so I’m actually Asian Indian American. So both of my parents are Indian and immigrated from India. I’m Gujarati by background specifically, my last name Patel kind of gives that away. So I was born in the United States, so I was born in Alabama and I was raised in Mississippi. I’ve spent most of my life here and my dream was always to be able to help people. So when my grandfather passed, he asked that I pursue a career in a way that I can help people and make a meaningful difference the way that he did. He was a farmer, but spent a lot of his life’s work in philanthropy. And so for me, I loved medicine and it just seemed like not only could I have the American dream, but I could do something really special and helping people in an area that I’m really interested in. And so I was the first in my family, in my immediate family, to go to college in the United States, medical school, and become a physician. And then my younger sister ended up following in the footsteps, but she’s now a plastic surgery resident, and my younger brother is now wrapping up his final year of medical school as well. So all of us decided to pursue a career in medicine, but different specialties.

Anne: That’s so cute. It’s like a little family business. Very adorable. Everyone was inspired in the same way, that’s very cute! Thank you for sharing.

Dr. Avani Patel: Yeah, even though we’re all different. Yeah.

Anne: Yeah, it’s like, you guys all have different niches, but kind of like the same goal in the end, which is so nice. 

 

05:44 Growing Up Asian Indian American in Mississippi

Anne: So throughout like your career, how do you feel that you’ve been able to balance your personal life, relationships, and also advancing your career in terms of career development during your training and also now that you’re established in your practice?

Dr. Avani Patel: Yeah, so I realized there is a part of the last question that I feel like I didn’t get to answer and something I kind of wanted to bring up and then I’ll move into this question because I think they kind of go together. So during the last question, you know, I think my background really inspired me because I realized where I grew up, you were either, you know, white or black, but nothing in between. And so in fact, you– I faced a lot more adversity being in the other category, if you will. And that was really interesting because I worried about, will I be able to get enough experience to go into medical school? You know I come from a humble background and humble family background, am I going to be able to have the resources? And throughout this time, I realized as I experienced adversity, I never want to treat people in the ways that I’ve been treated, my family’s been treated. And I think that’s something I’m really proud of that I see across the board with those of Asian heritage and background, is that we really are– do a great job, I think, of being able to overcome adversity, developing resilience, and grit. But it’s hard. It’s hard and we often don’t always check our mental health in that process. But fortunately, I use that to drive me to want to do more, to want to do better, and to also never treat people in the way that I wouldn’t want to be treated. 

And so that’s actually what inspired me to pursue the Health Equity Fellowship because the majority of the patient population of Mississippi, we actually have the highest black minority population in the country. And so if 80% of my patients identified as a minority, how was I gonna be able to do a good job of treating them? And so that’s how a lot of my background shaped, I think, who I am and the way that I practice, because I’m very down to earth, and I think that’s really important to remember that we’re all human at the end of the day. And it really allowed me to be able to speak to people in a way that I think is more personable. And that’s something that I encourage everybody to always keep about yourself. The more personable you are, the more you’re gonna be able to relate to your patients. And you know, it’s interesting because when we’re treating patients, there’s a lot of formulaic black and white understanding of the physiology, and in psychiatry. there’s a lot of gray. And what I realized is, when you really look at the data, sometimes what we’re not accounting for, and the thing we can’t measure is the rapport that we have with people. And so I think that’s something, that’s a really important point and a special point, and having that identity, that cultural background, and being ‘othered’, has really allowed me to progress forward in a way where I never want anyone else to feel othered in my interactions with them as a physician. So that’s something that’s really important to me. 

 

08:35 Work-Life Harmony

Dr. Avani Patel: Now in terms of kind of how to balance it all, I don’t like to say work-life balance. And it’s a phrase I’ve used before, but now I look at work-life harmony. Because the reality is that we’re never truly going to feel balanced. Nothing is ever going to be 50/50. And we have to be comfortable with that idea. But what’s important is feeling fulfilled when we’re achieving that harmony. So it might be that we are working more and we’re going to through different stages of our training in our life where that’s going to happen. In medical school, you are consumed with clinicals and absorbing all of this information and processing it. And sometimes it leaves little time for personal life. And in that process, I think the people who really care about you tend to stick around. And so, I say that people often go through our lives in seasons. And it’s okay if they go through life in seasons because they were meant to teach you something in that season. But guess what, there’s another season to experience. And so, I often say when we experience loss, or we experience the winds, it’s important to experience all of it. And that’s, I think, the really special part of being human. Otherwise, we would all end up being real life ChatGPT AI robots. And so in that process, you know, we understand that medicine is a very unique field. There’s a lot of sacrifice that’s made through this. But it’s important to choose yourself sometimes. And so throughout medical school, I’ll tell you one of the things that I never compromised on, and maybe I would have been a dermatologist or plastic surgeon or something at this point, was sleep. I love it, I love sleep. And so I said, you know, I know I’ve got exams, but I’m better off sleeping and just taking the L and making a guess, than I am continuing to push myself. And those are the ways that I found work-life harmony. And then even in residency, one of the things I prioritize– so for me, I’m not married, I don’t have kids, it’s something I definitely desire, and I say if it’s something you want, don’t give up on it. But if it’s something you don’t want, it’s absolutely okay. One of the hardest things is to be honest with ourselves, I think, whenever we’re dealing with these life things, because our career is so structured for us, right? Like we have a pathway that’s, that’s laid out for us. We know we have to go to medical school. We know we have to go to residency, maybe even fellowship. And then we kind of choose the next step in our career, whether it’s to be employed or go out on our own. There are steps that we go through in stages, but our personal life is not necessarily always laid out in that same fashion. And so in that process, I think we learn some adaptability, we learn flexibility, we learn that harmony between work-life is going to look different for everyone. And so, I always prioritize family, friends, and then travel, because travel makes me happy, and some of the extracurriculars. So because I wasn’t really responsible of having to take care of another human, or fur baby, or anything, it allowed for more time to be able to pursue some of these leadership activities that really gave me a lot of joy and made me more motivated to be a better medical student, resident, and now a physician today.

Anne: That’s great advice. I think, like you were saying, in the end, it’s really good for us to understand that, you know, we’re humans, our patients are humans. So then it’s good to be more forgiving, more understanding of anything that’s up and down and that way we can kind of be more resilient, and take better care of ourselves and other people too. 

 

12:03 Health Equity Leadership & Cultural Competence in Mississippi

Anne: I know you spoke to your Health Equity Fellowship before, and I actually find that really interesting, that’s not something I know a lot about and I don’t think I know a lot of people who’ve done like, a Health Equity Fellowship before. So I was just wondering if you could speak to like what that was like, how you kind of got into it, what you did during that fellowship, and then how you apply that now for caring for your patients in a culturally competent, health equity-minded way, especially in Mississippi, where you could potentially have less exposure to diverse populations.

Dr. Avani Patel: Yeah, absolutely. I think that’s such a great question. So the fellowship, I will tell you which one I did, and I actually encourage everybody, when you feel you’re in the right stage to do, it’s actually meant for attending physicians. However, I was the first resident physician to pursue this. And I’m glad I did because those skill sets really helped me throughout my training. However, if I could go back, I may have waited until I was early career, because then you’re going to be in positions where you can make a more significant change on a system level sometimes, which we often don’t get an opportunity to do in training, only because we’re learning how to be doctors and take care of people and there’s a lot more, I think, pressure, as well as bureaucracy that we’re going to have to deal with. It’s very different from whenever you’re out and you kind of get to make choices in terms of what level of leadership and ownership do you want, which had actually played a huge role into why I didn’t end up going employed. Because I wanted to have a level of autonomy and a voice to be able to take care of people the way that I want, advocate in the way that I want, and also be able to set a standard for, you know, speakerships, educating, teaching, all of those things without having to go through the red tape. So I did the American Medical Association Satcher Health Leadership Institute Medical Justice and Advocacy Fellowship. I know that’s a mouthful, but all of that basically translates into a Health Equity Fellowship because it actually was born out of the Center for Health Equity at the AMA. And throughout that time, what I– what my goal was initially is that I noticed is that again, because 80% of my population identified as a minority, yet I live in a very red state, there are sometimes a bit of a mismatch in communication, as well as a distrust of the healthcare system and the physicians who are providing that care.

And I’ll actually recount a story from when I was a medical student, where I was in my third year of medical school, or maybe second year, I was going through clinicals, learning how to do a lung exam for the first time, and I wanted to hear rales. And so, I had a patient who was in her 90s, and I remember being with a colleague, who was a Caucasian male, and she said that my colleague could listen to her lungs, but I could not. And that was the first time in a long time where I thought, ‘what do I do?’ I mean, this, and she said, “Your kind is not welcome here.” And that was very hard for me. But I was in adrenaline mode and so, I realized in that moment, you know, I was basically damage controlling, where I said “Look, I understand how you may feel about me. I’m not looking to change your opinion. However, this is really important for me to listen to you because this may be able to help me save lives in the future.” And eventually, you know, through some disconcerted looks and some silent moments and pauses, she allowed me to listen to her. When I walked out of that room, I broke down. I didn’t realize how much how it had affected me, and it was sad to me that here we were in 20-, you know, -18 or 2017, and we’re still having to have these conversations and deal with this. And I don’t know– I didn’t know that’s how I would react and I wouldn’t want that for other people. But in that moment I realized I never want to be the person to put somebody else in that position, which is why I wanted to educate myself. 

And so that’s what really inspired me to pursue the Health Equity Fellowship, because there’s a lot of pain that I think that comes from that, and that was also very traumatic because it reminded me a lot of what I had gone through growing up in a very rural area in the South. So interestingly, I thought whenever I’m finished with training, I will leave Mississippi and I will never look back. But I realized that if everyone like me leaves, how will we ever experience change? How will we ever get to take care of people in the way that they deserve if we’re not willing to give back in these areas? But I also think it’s really important to take care of ourselves and our mental health care. So it depends on where you’re at in your journey with resilience and grit. I knew in my mind that I was not going to be able to change what she had been taught for the last 95 years. I really don’t think it was about me. It was about the values she had been taught. So when you’re able to compartmentalize and depersonalize it, it’s not to say that it makes it okay, but it allowed for me to realize that this wasn’t about me. And how can I contribute in society and be an advocate, so that my patients would never have that feeling the way that I did. And so, that’s something that I really wanted to be better versed on, particularly with some of the health equity related terminology. 

So something I didn’t realize that was actually a focus was actually understanding cultural differences and stigmas around mental health, which was helpful. And so, for me and the population I treat, they identify as black, and much of the stigma around it is praying it away. And even for me, you know, my cultural background, mental health was not really a thing, and there was a lot of pressure I received when I said– I thought I was gonna be an anesthesiologist, and then I changed my mind and decided to be a psychiatrist, and the reaction was, “So you went to medical school to do what? Out of all the things you could have done, that’s what you want to do?” And there was a lot of pressure. And even from mentors who were non-Asian, who said to me, “If you become a psychiatrist, no one’s ever going to respect you.” And I thought to myself, the best thing you can ever say to me is that I can’t do something, and I’m going to prove you wrong, and I’m going to show you that you can. And so, I’ve always found that mental health care is my passion because I really enjoy the ability of being able to understand people, relate to them even if I come from a different background, and communicate how we can heal. And I’m able to do that in a variety of ways, through therapy, through medication management. And it’s grey. You get to be creative and I’m very much a creative. So I get to use all these various modalities to really help people heal, which is pretty special. And I thought to myself, if I can save a life when someone can otherwise take it by choice? That’s something really special. And if I can make people feel like they’re understood, no matter what background they come from, then I’ve done something very special here. I’ve cracked the code, right? That’s all we really want. We all want to feel understood. We all want to achieve success in what we have envisioned for ourselves that success is. But that’s what’s interesting, is that success looks really different for everybody. And there are certain barriers, depending on what your background and what your gender may be. I have very much experienced all of those things. But it’s also important to kind of learn the system and learn how to navigate that system to be able to be in those places then to create change.

Anne: I really do agree with you that psychiatry is such an intimate specialty where you can really personalize the care that you give people, and you can also like, really get to know them as well. And then I can totally see how like a Health Equity Fellowship would better prepare you to have these deep meaningful conversations with people and then encourage them to take care of themselves and then be a part of that healing process with them. 

 

20:07 Sitting in Discomfort & Determining Your Boundaries

Anne: Just to build off of that story that you shared, I know a lot of medical students have trouble sometimes standing up for themselves when they’re going through clinicals and things like that, of maybe confusion of how to interact with patients or with other people and with the medical student hierarchy and everything during their training. I was just wondering if you’ve had any other strategies that have helped you advocate for yourself in these professional settings.

Dr. Avani Patel: Absolutely. One of the most, hard things to understand is that medicine still has a very traditional view of things in terms of a hierarchy system. And we know that as medical students, we tend to be at the bottom of the totem pole. However, I do think that the landscape is changing and medical students do have a lot more power than they think they have. But one of the things I caution people is to use it judiciously. Because sometimes we’re going to be an uncomfortable situations that we’re meant to experience. And it’s not ever nice to experience them, it’s not fair to experience them, but part of life is that it’s not going to be nice or fair. And so being able to gauge how we’re going to react to those things and handle those things are really important. 

And so, the advice that I share is the same advice that I share to patients because I think it stands the test of time and it’s something I do today. When something has hurt us or when something feels uncomfortable or when we feel like something is unfair. We often– it’s human nature to have a knee-jerk reaction of some sort, and that’s typically related to our personality. Right? We go in fight or flight mode and we’re like, okay, how do I do this? And for some people, their fight or flight mode, depending on what their cultural background is, is to remain timid, quiet, and just blend into the wall and just move on. For others, it might be addressing it right then, right there, right now, and I’m not sure that either method is really the method that’s going to help us solve the issue. So I would say taking time and being able to reflect on what happened is really important. Because we’re not in a state where we’re able to really, I think, address what’s going on. And being able to sit with something is very important. And so one of the things I recommend, and this is something I’ve gotten better with over time, and as I’ve gotten older, is, I like to sometimes write it down and have it be tangible and let me see what the situation is. Like how I felt about it, what happened, and keep in mind we’re always going to come in with a biased lens because it’s our version of the story, right? And then I need to, I like to sit with it. Because if you’re angry or if you have these feelings of discomfort. It’s gonna come across in the way that we respond. And so it might still be too emotional for us before we can address it. And so being able to sit with it, taking a look at it, asking people that you trust, whether it’s family, whether it’s mentors– I’ve done that where I’ve called mentors and I’ve said, “Hey, I experienced this, and I’m not really sure how to respond, but I know that it really upset me, I’m really emotional, and I want to make sure I’m doing this level headed.” And I can always refer back to my notes of how I’ve described the situation, how I feel and how I would want to respond. and then asking the question, “How should I respond?” Right? So that way, we’re always having a different perspective, which is important and it allows us to grow. So what we’re doing is we’re then wiring our brains on how to respond in a way that’s leadership driven, right, that’s evidence driven, and that’s a little bit less emotional because we now have perspective outside of ourselves from people who we deem to be leaders if that’s where we want to go. And that way, we’re also not feeling gaslighted, right? We want to make sure we have people who are on our team because this is gonna come up, this is gonna happen throughout our lifetime in a variety of settings, personally, professionally. 

And I think that’s the best way to be able to advocate for yourself is having mentorship and being able to take a step back when we’re less reactive. Um, so that way we’re able to make the best decision moving forward. Because one of the things I see often is I see people who die on every hill. And guess what? The people who don’t get listened to, who then get dismissed are the people who die on every hill. And it’s not that I’m not inspired by their passion and the fact that they’re standing up for themselves and advocating for themselves, but there’s strategy involved. It’s all about timing, place, and strategy. And that’s the way that you grow in leadership. And so the most successful people you’ll notice, it really doesn’t have as much to do with their level of intelligence. It has everything to do with their level of discipline and strategy. And that’s includes our own emotional regulation and control. And one of the things that I think humans do a really bad job of, that I think, that it’s important, is being able to sit in some discomfort. Because it’s important for us to get used to feelings of discomfort, but also understanding where the lines are in terms of what our boundaries are. So those are two different things, right? Being able to set boundaries and then being able to sit in discomfort. Because our boundaries drive how we advocate for ourselves moving forward, and having outside perspective of those with more experience, like a mentor or a family member who’s had a little bit more life experience on them, can really help us determine where we want our boundaries to live and where we want our areas of discomfort to be.

Anne: Yeah, I really like that idea, like what you were saying about that balance between boundaries and discomfort. I know for me, personally, like any type of discomfort makes me freak out a little bit. I kind of– I want to act on it. But like you were saying, you know, taking a step back, so I can understand myself, having other people give their input, so I can then again understand myself and the experience better. It kind of serves you in the end because then you just have a deeper understanding, a better plan of how to move forward instead of just acting on something and having to deal with the consequences of that. Yeah, I love the idea of sitting in your discomfort for a little bit. I think, it is uncomfortable, but it’s–.

Dr. Avani Patel: Right?

Anne: But being able to sit with it makes you more resilient too.

Dr. Avani Patel: It does, and I think it not only helps you in your professional life, but personal life too, right? One of my favorite examples is using a romantic example. Let’s say there’s someone you really like, and you’re like, okay, what do they think of me? It’s like we’re overthinking, we’re overanalyzing, it’s making us uncomfortable, but because we want something to happen now, sometimes that can be kind of suffocating. And so for the person on the other end, what’s the natural human inclination? It’s to take a step back because you’re like whoa, whoa, whoa, wait a minute. We’re really reactive, like, this is a lot. This is really overwhelming, this is feeling smothering. Well, it’s the same way in professional areas and conflict. And so the people you notice handle conflict really well are the ones who are willing to take a step back and are basically, kind of like, microdosing themselves and being able to sit with discomfort. And it’s something that I’ve learned, and the trick I’ve learned over time, and has actually allowed me to be not only more effective as a leader, but more respected in the rooms that I’m in. 

Anne: That makes a lot of sense, there’s always something to learn from discomfort, because there’s something to resolve at that point. This is a really great idea that we can all kind of incorporate into our training as early on as possible, so like we just get better at handling difficult situations because it’s going to happen for us, especially in medicine. 

Dr. Avani Patel: You know, and it allows us to connect with people too, right? So part of being human is we are required and we need social interaction and social connection. Like the US Surgeon General in 2023 put out a report about the loneliness epidemic. And he didn’t just mean personally, he meant all facets of our lives. And so, that’s professionally too. That’s why I’m a big, big, big proponent of mentorship and seeking out mentorship, and not only locally, nationally, in whatever circles of life that you’re in, because there’s many different types of mentors we can have, whether in medicine, outside of medicine, in the community, I think it’s really important. Because it allows us to get better at testing our patience, building our resilience, again sitting in that level of discomfort, but also strategy planning so we can grow in leadership and advocate for ourselves in the same token.

 

28:30 What Good Mentorship Looks Like

Anne: On that note, what do you think makes a good mentor? Because as medical students, we’re always seeking mentors, looking for people to make professional networks with, but I think it’s difficult to establish these relationships sometimes.

Dr. Avani Patel: It can be because everyone’s so busy, right? And we go back to the idea of work-life harmony. But I do think there are people who love to pay it forward because they’ve received mentorship, they understand the value of mentorship, and those are the types of mentors that you’d want anyway. The people who don’t really value what mentorship can do or mentor-mentee relationship are probably not going to be the people who would make great mentors anyway, in my opinion. And so, I feel that one of the most important things is understanding that mentorship is a two way street. But as a mentee, we’re probably going to be putting in more of the legwork. And that’s just the truth of the matter because our mentors are likely going to be very busy. So one of the things that allows me to have many mentors and great mentorship relationships is that I’m consistent. I will always reach out, I will always check in, not only just for advice, but personally as well. And I think having that established relationship, even if it’s just an exchange of a message or two, is really important because it reminds the person in your life, they’re very important to you. Not only from a mentor capacity, but professionally and personally as well, that this is a relationship that you really, really value and someone who makes you feel safe. 

Now, there’s a caveat with it. Because if you have a mentor who basically encourages you to do every single thing that you want to do, to react in every single way that you want to react, are they really mentoring, right? So again, I think I seek a mentor who makes me uncomfortable sometimes, who will challenge me and say, “I’m just offering you a different perspective. What if you responded or reacted in this way?” The ones who say, “So I’m not saying you have to do it, but I’m offering it to you and I would support you no matter what, because I care about you and you’re my mentee.” So I’ve had some mentors who have given me some tough love, who have made me uncomfortable and sit in discomfort. But that’s really important because it’s been great for my growth. And then I have also had mentors who I realized in the end, weren’t really invested in me. Because all it was, was a feel good for them, in the sense of, okay, I’m doing this, I’m paying it forward, except I wasn’t really growing or learning from that relationship. And you need to have both. And I’ve even had mentors that I would say are no longer mentors, because I think it also shows you kind of, who’s on your team, who you’re looking to grow with. And they give you examples as you get to know people, right? We get to know people and we have ideas of them on the surface because everybody puts their best face forward. But sometimes over time, the more you get to know them, the more you realize they may not be the right fit for you. Or they’re teaching you something and that– there are things that they do that you know you don’t want to do moving forward or you don’t feel would be an accurate representation of who you are, the way you want to pursue your career, whether professionally, personally, any of those things. And so, mentors can come in a variety of ways, kind of like friendship, and I think nurturing that is important, understanding that you’re gonna put in more legwork is important, and that not every single person has to be your mentor. And it’s also okay to end a mentor-mentee relationship if you feel like it’s not serving you. 

Anne: That’s really good advice. I feel that for me, when I am trying to find a mentor, sometimes I really focus on this, like, perfect fit, they have to do everything exactly, like I want to do, have the same goals, the exact career that I want to achieve. But I feel that, you know, based on what you were saying, we can really have mentors that serve us in different aspects of our career. Like they can provide me with advice on this, or this mentor can make me feel a little more challenged, a little more, sit in discomfort like you were saying. And these are all things that can help us grow, which is I think a really, like a great way to approach mentorship is to reach out to people and then be open to different types of mentor experiences. Thank you for that. 

 

32:35 Reflections & Career Advice for Your Past Self

Anne: I think for our last question, this is gonna be a little bit of like a reflection for you. So if you could go back and give your younger self one piece of career advice, what would it be?

Dr. Avani Patel: I love this question for many reasons. The first reason is because it’s such a challenging question to answer. Because we’re all gonna be so different as we reflect on our younger selves. And there’s not a one size fits all answer for it. But one of the things that I think would be applicable to everybody, is to understand that you shouldn’t apologize for being you. Because you wouldn’t be here if it weren’t for you being you. And yes, you’re going to make mistakes. Yes, you’re going to do things and say things that you regret. Yes, you’re going to wish, “Oh, I should have studied instead of going to dinner with my friends.” And there’s always going to be a what if? Or should I have? Or should I not have? But it all comes together perfectly in my opinion because it makes you who you are. You become the person that you’re meant to be and I’m a firm believer in that. Whether you are someone who is spiritual, religious, not religious. I firmly believe that it always ends up working out in the way that it’s supposed to. And so as you experience adversity, as you experience biases in the field, which I have experienced many, age, race, gender. Just remember that you are always meant to be in the place that you’re supposed to be in, and you’re meant to have these experiences, whether they’re joyous, whether they’re uncomfortable, we are all gonna experience the hills and valleys. And so, even though sometimes it’s hard to see light at the end of the tunnel, it’s there, and never apologize for being you and try to be as patient with yourself throughout the process and enjoy as much of it as you can. Because it is fleeting and you realize how fast life moves. And it’s wild to think that just yesterday, I say yesterday, but this is 13 years in the making. I remember thinking in college, I finally get a chance to live out my dream. I get a chance to be a physician. And now I’m in my first year of practice, I serve in a multitude of roles, which I actually didn’t mention and may be helpful. So not only do I have my private practice, but I’m also a behavioral health medical director for a managed care entity. And so what I got hired on for is to build out our behavioral health coverage plan for our Medicaid population. And I’m the youngest in the country. In addition, I also contract my time to two rehabs. So I work with the post-incarcerated homeless Medicaid population, which I really really enjoy because it’s particularly challenging as you’re doing dual diagnosis work, and then my private practice is more catered toward a higher socioeconomic status population. And I did this because when I was in training, I was actually seeing, or funneled, a lot of our quote on quote VIP patients, and I realized I worked really well with high achieving individuals, but they also have their own unique challenges to recovery. And so I really get the full spectrum of individuals that I get a chance to treat. And I never thought I would have done this and I never thought I would really be the person that I am today. But I realized I wouldn’t be the person I am today if I didn’t get to experience all of the highs and lows in life. And there are things that we’re always gonna want and desire, and more is always going to be more, because that’s what we’re taught, it’s human nature. But if I could go back, I would say, enjoy all of the highs and lows. Be patient with yourself. Don’t apologize for who you are. And that’s the beautiful part of life. I think that’s the lesson we’re meant to learn.

Anne: Thank you, that’s a nice note to end our conversation today, a message of self-love and trust in ourselves, trust in our abilities, trust in our careers, which I think is very important for all of us because as a medical student, we’re on this very long path. It’s easy to get burnt out. So easy to kind of start losing our steam as we’re looking ahead. But in the end, like you were saying, I think just taking care of ourselves, trusting ourselves, and then knowing that we’ll– we’ll get to our end destination. And even if that destination is a little different than what we expected, sometimes it’s still like a very great journey.

Dr. Avani Patel: Think about it, you were chosen on this path. There are so many people who would kill to be in your position, but you were chosen to be on this path. We are the top 1% of the population. And that’s a pretty special thing. It doesn’t feel like it or doesn’t seem like it. But as you reflect and look at things on a larger scale, people are going to trust you with things they don’t even trust their spouse with, their children with. And that’s a pretty– I mean those are some big shoes to fill right? But that’s also why we do the grind because there’s something in us that realizes we want to do something bigger than ourselves and what’s outside of ourselves and I think medicine allows us that pathway.

Anne: That’s so nice to hear from someone who’s like been through been through it all. I think that it’s very inspiring to hear, especially knowing that for me I have a long journey ahead. I think it’s great to hear something that you would tell basically yourself at my point in my career too. 

Dr. Avani Patel: Absolutely, I really enjoyed it. I– for everyone who listens, just understand, I see you, I hear you. It’s such a psychiatrist thing to say, but it’s so true because the journey is worth it. And the thing is, is that we can’t predict life, right? That’s one of the cool things is that we get to experience it, not predict it. And there’s a lot of fear around that, but I think there’s also a lot of excitement in what the unknown is because then we hold the cards. It’s up to us in terms of what our next play is going to be.


A Message From Our President

Welcome to the Asian Pacific American Medical Student Association (APAMSA)! Here, you’ll discover how we’re tackling critical health disparities in Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) communities by uniting the next generation of AANHPI medical students and healthcare leaders in our collective mission for health equity.

As the largest 501(c)(3) nonprofit representing the AANHPI medical community, APAMSA unites healthcare professionals at every career stage—from pre-medical students to seasoned attending physicians—in our shared mission to transform AANHPI health outcomes. For over 30 years, we’ve served as a national leader in health equity through advocacy, philanthropy, leadership, and professional development. What started as an Internet message forum has grown into a powerful network of 180+ chapters nationwide, advancing our work from local communities to national platforms.

By mobilizing medical students, physicians, and community partners, we’re building a future where every AANHPI individual has access to culturally competent care, life-saving treatments, and equitable health opportunities. Through initiatives like bone marrow registration, hepatitis and cancer screening, mental health advocacy, and community outreach, we address disparities with data-driven action. Furthermore, now more than ever, we are deepening our commitment to inclusivity with dedicated committees and programs that uplift the unique needs of all AANHPI subgroups. This is more than medicine; this is justice in action—and we’re just getting started.


Join us in fulfilling our 2025-26 National Goals, which we call the year of “RICE”:

  • Recognition & ReverenceHonoring our past, securing our future.

We are committed to ensuring APAMSA’s sustainability for the next 30 years and beyond—through strategic sponsorships, fundraising, and the unwavering support of our community. By deepening engagement with our alumni, we will foster lifelong connections, ensuring APAMSA remains a pillar of support at every stage of a healthcare professional’s journey.

  • Invigoration & InitiativeBuilding pathways for impact.

We will pioneer research opportunities to advance AANHPI health, revitalize our pre-med mentorship program, and launch a robust alumni-mentorship initiative to keep our leaders invested in APAMSA’s mission. Additionally, from local health fairs and cancer and health screenings, to the launching of our inaugural National APAMSA Hepatitis & Health Equities Conference 2025, we will amplify awareness of the disparities facing our communities and drive actionable change.

  • Cultivation & CommitmentFrom advocacy to action.

We will empower our members with the resources, networks, and platforms to transform health equity principles into actionable policy and political impact—through tangible measures such as improving upon our advocacy toolkit and providing more funding for advocacy-based programming. Additionally, by forging stronger alliances with organizations like the Student National Medical Association (SNMA), the Latino Medical Student Association (LMSA), the American Medical Women’s Association (AMWA), the Council of Young Filipinx Americans in Medicine (CYFAM), the Medical Student Pride Alliance (MSPA), the American Medical Student Association (AMSA), the Student Osteopathic Medical Association (SOMA), the American Medical Association (AMA), and the American Osteopathic Association (AOA), we will unite the broader medical community in solidarity. Through targeted professional development and leadership opportunities, we will ensure APAMSA champions intersectionality and elevates historically marginalized voices within the AANHPI community.

  • Expansion & EvolutionGrowing stronger, reaching further.

We will refine APAMSA’s brand as a beacon of hope and unity—from our local chapters to the National Board—ensuring every AANHPI medical student and pre-med feels seen and supported. By expanding our membership through new chapters, scholarships, and travel grants, we will break barriers and create a more inclusive, empowered future for our community.

Now, I would like to personally invite you to join our mission by becoming a member of APAMSA today. If you would like to stay connected with our organization, please consider following our Facebook, Twitter/X, Tiktok, Youtube, and Instagram, or signing up for our newsletter to stay in the loop for all things APAMSA—from scholarship opportunities, professional development workshops, and all other upcoming events. We look forward to you joining the APAMSA family and standing together in solidarity as we aim for true health equity. 

“Sometimes we can offer a cure, sometimes only a salve, sometimes not even that. But whatever we can offer, our interventions, and the risks and sacrifices they entail, are justified only if they serve the larger aims of a person’s life.” – Atul Gawande, MD, MPH

Yours Truly,

James Maxwell Chua, MS, OMS-II

He/Him/His
National President

president@apamsa.org


Shawn Lim, Region 9 Director

Network Director

Shawn Lim is currently a third year medical student at the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) in Galveston, Texas. He was born and raised in Sugar Land, Texas and graduated from the University of Texas at Dallas with a B.S. in Biochemistry. After college, he worked as a medical assistant at a neurology clinic and a dermatology clinic before pursing his love for coffee as a barista. He has spent two years involved in UTMB’s local APAMSA chapter, including one year as chapter President, before taking on his current role as a Region IX Co-Director. He is passionate about investing in the next generation and is a strong proponent of “paying it forward”. Outside of school, he enjoys playing sports, trying new recipes, exploring new restaurants, and travel. After graduation, he aims to pursue a career as a dermatologist.


Aliza Ali, Region 9 Director

Network Director

Hi everyone! I’m excited to step into my role as the Region IX Director for APAMSA this year. As a rising fourth-year medical student and former South Asian Director, I’ve had the privilege of witnessing the incredible impact APAMSA has on our communities and future physicians. This organization has given me invaluable experiences, lifelong friendships, and a deeper passion for advocacy and mentorship. I can’t wait to see what this year holds and work alongside such an inspiring group of leaders!



Francis Khuong, Region 9 Director

Network Director

Howdy, y’all! My name is Francis Khuong, and I am an MD-PhD student at Texas Tech University Health Science Center. Outside of school, I serve as one of the Asian Pacific American Medical Student Association (APAMSA) Region IX Directors. Before medical school, I obtained my B.S. in Biochemistry from the University of Texas at Dallas and worked at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center as a research technician in the Wetzel Lab, studying the mechanisms of internalization for Leishmania parasites. I continue to take an avid interest in Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs), and am planning to continue focusing on Leishmania during the PhD portion of my training with the Karamysheva lab. In my free time, I play games, hang out with my cat (Nori), and travel whenever I can!